ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] IPC input on draft response to proposed RDS Charter revisions

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] IPC input on draft response to proposed RDS Charter revisions
  • From: Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 20 Dec 2016 12:19:07 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Cc: "Paul McGrady (Policy)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=myacu.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-acu-edu-au; h=From:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=mTxK4ijFWYZof5EIFPZiczCYXC0CT1EKYg6vCK9gJP0=; b=sN5yJyLETcxEViLzVnvJG0g9JYutFM74lQHjv4mlvFe1DOz/d4Q5mt8ccA0HQv0ox5Iwp71PO6IbQ2JwbxRXojbo7KMudItj4nMnEdy7ArypZdW/qC9wtm5UeqSpaSabogLv+poGjDDp0PDj/iywN/yKc2Ct7GV0ggd6l9pl06c=
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:99
  • Thread-index: AQHSWrorgtXbbyzaXkqaluwXAbZFFg==
  • Thread-topic: IPC input on draft response to proposed RDS Charter revisions

Dear colleagues,

Following up on our action items from the Council meeting last week, the IPC is 
grateful to Susan and Keith for their work on developing the strawman response 
from Council in relation to the proposed narrowing of the scope of the charter 
of the forthcoming RDS Review.

Please find attached the strawman with a few proposed modifications by the IPC, 
plus these clarifying questions:

  *   The bylaws language in red - is there a reason for the red text?
Items 1 and 2 refer to "current RDS efforts" - should we specify exactly what 
this means? (ie, does this refer to the Registration Directory Services as 
is/currently running, improvement efforts underway but not yet fully 
operational (e.g., PPSAI), or does it refer to the efforts of the RDS PDP WG? 
Or all of the above?)
4.6(e)(i) refers to efforts ICANN should make with the SO/ACs "to improve 
accuracy and access to generic top-level domain registration data."  This goal 
is not reflected in the Charter items. Isn't it appropriate that the RT review 
the "efforts" underway to see if this goal is being met?

Best wishes,


Attachment: IPC edits to strawman re review team.docx
Description: IPC edits to strawman re review team.docx

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>