Re: [council] Response to Board Request re: IRD Working Group Report
> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 3. unless explicitly stated otherwise, all data elements should be tagged
> with the languages/scripts in use, and this information should always be
> available with the data element. (not addressed)
> I also note that the input we received from Jim Galvin addressed this issue,
> and that the T/T consensus policy on this point does require that
> internationalized data elements fields in the RDS should be easily
> identifiable. Furthermore, the consensus policy requires identification of
> the language in which the authoritative IRD was originally submitted, in the
> event T/T takes place. These all seem to be nicely consistent with the
> findings of the IRD WG, and should hopefully address Steve’s questions.
Incidentally, this is also consistent with the consistent labelling and display
requirement in the “thick” WHOIS CP.