ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Response to Board Request re: IRD Working Group Report

Hi again,

> On Dec 13, 2016, at 5:30 PM, Amr Elsadr <aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


> 3. unless explicitly stated otherwise, all data elements should be tagged 
> with the languages/scripts in use, and this information should always be 
> available with the data element. (not addressed)
> I also note that the input we received from Jim Galvin addressed this issue, 
> and that the T/T consensus policy on this point does require that 
> internationalized data elements fields in the RDS should be easily 
> identifiable. Furthermore, the consensus policy requires identification of 
> the language in which the authoritative IRD was originally submitted, in the 
> event T/T takes place. These all seem to be nicely consistent with the 
> findings of the IRD WG, and should hopefully address Steve’s questions.

Incidentally, this is also consistent with the consistent labelling and display 
requirement in the “thick” WHOIS CP.

Thanks again.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>