ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
  • From: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2016 21:48:27 -0500
  • Cc: Susan Kawaguchi <susank@xxxxxx>, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Anthony Harris <anthonyrharris@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=endurance.com; s=google; h=user-agent:date:subject:from:to:cc:message-id:thread-topic :references:in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=Zafi0EcZnekwpiklFWzvCyZ2lCnV5xPByNr2clzDTTY=; b=ZutqpU/g6iLCYL/PvSXktw0HKhXASytO2KufpZX+nlYN0hEC8JCvJAPTzSFt75O6Oz 8I7fVtOGRm70aflytDOLdttu4JYTXn/8Fh9VrjZfa9noN7J+UJsOjtEGf5mFkvkEWREv fl6Q0jrG4mp8BE2GmFe3Qh0A+782T64fi4hf4=
  • In-reply-to: <CAKOnLmqHKSLVfc_b9xrKSvJ_vXF7K2qzBGtKoxGkT1DJSZfqNg@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <97C8E14B-3E1F-42BD-97B4-E5F8070E453C@fb.com> <8E84A14FB84B8141B0E4713BAFF5B84E2238D3AD@Exchange.sierracorporation.com> <CAKOnLmqHKSLVfc_b9xrKSvJ_vXF7K2qzBGtKoxGkT1DJSZfqNg@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-topic: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.1.161117

All,

 

I appreciate the support for James’ suggestion.  

 

Based on concerns expressed by some, I’ve revised the last two paragraphs of 
the letter slightly (they are redlined so you can easily see the changes) and 
offer this friendly amendment (so to speak) to the draft letter that goes with 
this motion.  For those of you who already expressed support for James’ 
suggestion and the prior draft, is this new draft still agreeable to you?  I 
believe this new draft captures the same spirit, but opens up the possibility 
of solutions to what could end up being something more appropriate than the 
PPSAI IRT.

 

Please let me know if you have questions.  I’m happy to answer. 

 

Best,

Darcy

 

From: Anthony Harris <anthonyrharris@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 29, 2016 at 5:10 PM
To: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Susan Kawaguchi <susank@xxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to 
ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

I also agree with the letter being sent to the Board

 

Tony

 

On Mon, Nov 28, 2016 at 9:09 PM, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Concurring with my BC colleague.

 

Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal

Virtualaw LLC

1155 F Street, NW

Suite 1050

Washington, DC 20004

202-559-8597/Direct

202-559-8750/Fax

202-255-6172/Cell

 

Twitter: @VlawDC

 

"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Susan Kawaguchi
Sent: Monday, November 28, 2016 6:11 PM
To: Darcy Southwell; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN 
Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Hello, 

 

I agree with the letter being sent to the Board instead of a formal motion.

 

 

 

Susan Kawaguchi

Domain Name Manager

Facebook, Inc. 

Legal Dept. 

 

1601 Willow Road

Menlo Park, CA 94025

 

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 3:41 PM
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy

 

All,

 

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall 
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council 
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further 
direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were 
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our 
December 1 meeting.

 

Best,

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7859 / Virus Database: 4664/13314 - Release Date: 10/30/16
Internal Virus Database is out of date.

 

Attachment: GNSOCouncilLTRtoICANNBoardreIRTP-C v2.docx
Description: Microsoft Office



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>