Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

[Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

I support James’ suggestion on how to proceed.

 

Thanks,

Darcy

 

From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 9:58 PM
To: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board 
Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Thanks Donna.  

 

Figuring that many are out of the office this week, let’s give folks until 
Monday to weigh in or raise questions.

Thanks—

J.

 

From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 at 17:52 
To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board 
Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Hi James

 

Agree to proceed as you have suggested.

 

Thanks

 

Donna

 

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN 
Board Regarding Transfer Policy

 

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.


Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the 
Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow 
element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the 
ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and 
direction by the ICANN Board.

 

Question for the Council:  are there any questions or concerns on this topic, 
or is this relatively non-controversial?  If the latter, then I would ask that 
we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and 
ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.  

 

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

 

Thanks—

 

J.

 

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41 
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy

 

All,

 

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall 
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council 
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further 
direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were 
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our 
December 1 meeting.

 

Best,

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart