ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

  • To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
  • From: "Austin, Donna" <Donna.Austin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 23:52:18 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=neustar.biz; h=from : to : subject : date : message-id : references : in-reply-to : content-type : mime-version; s=neustar-biz; bh=qy8B0dK8RvDv1WWmsG5sgxfFcv1NLnJpHCysK5OnvUQ=; b=OHeyko1sQHKzl5rVljHu3U301Og4Ng/o//p7f8lyl6u61r5NaG+u9nG+HxGBWFFI+S8Q s++x+o5KC3v1yd5bHGU+97mcmCU0JaGlOJluYqTZYkTShqaAthRnVa7+W8hjqV+PLPnL 6FZdmo7zFgwCjN23lEqjNR7H28U4WKaAFlBsKU+HKTaMuqD79VeZUvjn/M2GdUZt4UUq 9cOd8vUj/4E9HQtoeIc9cMEh+EtpU8qOSP4ElITnOiCkFz4WESyndlteLzirxnEi5Usi daNoJESSMz/rGY+WU2wHddF4U5aJeovWOxX1w+hJiTt5yt0kJYQsbeqS9eu7NMEFxjnU hQ==
  • In-reply-to: <D795F3C8-474B-4785-9FF0-992F241B9016@godaddy.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D795F3C8-474B-4785-9FF0-992F241B9016@godaddy.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHSRHB1DDUnb2CK4UODZ5czxsvRnaDlreKw
  • Thread-topic: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
Hi James

Agree to proceed as you have suggested.

Thanks

Donna



From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, November 21, 2016 7:28 PM
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN 
Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.

Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the 
Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow 
element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the 
ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and 
direction by the ICANN Board.

Question for the Council:  are there any questions or concerns on this topic, 
or is this relatively non-controversial?  If the latter, then I would ask that 
we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and 
ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

Interested in hearing your thoughts.

Thanks—

J.


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy

All,

Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall 
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council 
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further 
direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were 
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our 
December 1 meeting.

Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
[ttps://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tjCmzaF_7ZGN1PtB2KAV5OVQn-Q_Xvh_p3zhRf5gB5-ISEZOkC_6lvGj1xU-T1CFq]
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>