<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
- From: Michele Neylon - Blacknight <michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2016 15:13:56 +0000
- Accept-language: en-IE, en-US
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHSRNMKDDUnb2CK4UODZ5czxsvRnQ==
- Thread-topic: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
- User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1c.1.161117
James
I’d obviously support that we proceed without a formal motion and submit the
letter.
Regards
Michele
--
Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions
Hosting, Colocation & Domains
http://www.blacknight.host/
http://blacknight.blog/
http://www.blacknight.press - get our latest news & media coverage
http://www.technology.ie
Intl. +353 (0) 59 9183072
Direct Dial: +353 (0)59 9183090
Social: http://mneylon.social
Random Stuff: http://michele.irish
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,R93 X265,Ireland Company No.: 370845
From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of James Bladel
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tuesday 22 November 2016 at 03:28
To: Darcy Southwell <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN
Board Regarding Transfer Policy
Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.
Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the
Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow
element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the
ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and
direction by the ICANN Board.
Question for the Council: are there any questions or concerns on this topic,
or is this relatively non-controversial? If the latter, then I would ask that
we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and
ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.
Interested in hearing your thoughts.
Thanks—
J.
From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Darcy Southwell
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding
Transfer Policy
All,
Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication. You will recall
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further
direction to ICANN staff. This motion and the draft communication were
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our
December 1 meeting.
Best,
Darcy
__________
Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
[tps://ci5.googleusercontent.com/proxy/tjCmzaF_7ZGN1PtB2KAV5OVQn-Q_Xvh_p3zhRf5gB5-ISEZOkC_6lvGj1xU-T1CFq]
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|