ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy

  • To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: re: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding Transfer Policy
  • From: "Edward Morris" <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2016 22:47:52 -0500
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=toast.net; s=smartermail; h=references:in-reply-to:x-originating-ip:content-type:mime-version :message-id:reply-to:date:subject:to:from; bh=MFy6xqogDSDgMT+jUlV6KPIKhbdMXVqw8col/U1Az6s=; b=Pr7aHnmJ0URV7fST3AMFHrzTONA6G6s1qsy4rxYYUQWCzQ+vpk0W2hzYDcqDQtZPr vZ0U5dUhJjxXIJxh4BfQErbM43FG/6mvJHdqRVpjwDJ7cbgdeGQcYNkFulxI0g+0b ETyhQ3g2KrAnTJmGrKMdtQWcCpvVpPYIMbYWHDCAo=
  • In-reply-to: <D795F3C8-474B-4785-9FF0-992F241B9016@godaddy.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D795F3C8-474B-4785-9FF0-992F241B9016@godaddy.com>
  • Reply-to: egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
 Hi James,

 I completely support both the letter and


----------------------------------------
    ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.

 your suggestion thereof. This is very time sensitive and will the rules 
presumably becoming live on December 1st (am I wrong here?) we're already 
playing catch up.

 A big thanks to Darcy for your hard work on this. This is a very important 
issue and I'm grateful for your leadership on it.

 Kind Regards,

 Ed Morris





----------------------------------------
 From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2016 3:29 AM
To: "Darcy Southwell" <darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Re: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN 
Board Regarding Transfer Policy

Thanks, Darcy, for raising this motion.

Councilors – as we discussed in Hyderabad, this request is coming from the 
Registrar Stakeholder Group, regarding the implementation of a very narrow 
element of IRTP-C. ICANN GDD Staff has indicated that they do not have the 
ability to agree to this request, absent a request from the GNSO Council and 
direction by the ICANN Board.



Question for the Council:  are there any questions or concerns on this topic, 
or is this relatively non-controversial?  If the latter, then I would ask that 
we consider the short time frame before the Board’s next meeting (8 DEC) and 
ask if we can proceed without a formal motion and submit the letter.



Interested in hearing your thoughts.



Thanks—



J.





From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Darcy Southwell 
<darcy.southwell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday, November 20, 2016 at 17:41
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy



All,



Attached is the Motion – GNSO Council Communication to ICANN Board Regarding 
Transfer Policy along with a proposed draft communication.  You will recall 
from our meetings in Hyderabad that ICANN GDD staff advised us that Council 
would need to submit this issue to the Board for consideration and further 
direction to ICANN staff.  This motion and the draft communication were 
prepared based on that advice, and I’d appreciate this being heard at our 
December 1 meeting.



Best,

Darcy

__________

Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

Attachment: Attachment 1
Description: Binary data

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>