[council] FW: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: ICANN's US jurisdiction
Council colleagues – See below for a statement published on the CCWG-ACCT mailing list. Thank you, J. From: <accountability-cross-community-bounces@xxxxxxxxx> on behalf of parminder <parminder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday, November 9, 2016 at 7:31 To: CCWG Accountability <accountability-cross-community@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] Fwd: ICANN's US jurisdiction All I thought this may be relevant to those on this list. Regard, parminder -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: ICANN's US jurisdiction Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2016 07:23:40 +0530 From: parminder <parminder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:parminder@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> To: governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:governance@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, BestBitsList <bestbits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:bestbits@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Forum@Justnetcoalition. Org <forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx><mailto:forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> All As you know, the issue of jurisdiction of ICANN is under consideration at ICANN's community process (in the accountability track where there is a sub group discussing this issue). ICANN is currently meeting in Hyderabad, India, from 3rd to 9th November. Today, on the last day of ICANN's Hyderabad meeting, the enclosed statement was issued by key Indian civil society organisations engaged with Internet governance issues, supported by two key global networks involved in this area. The statement expresses the urgent need for transiting ICANN from being under the jurisdiction of one country, presenting the rationale of why this is important to do. It also lists some possible options of doing so, towards beginning a serious action-oriented deliberation on this very important matter. Unlike what is often understood, the jurisdiction issue is not just a matter of sovereign prestige and self respect of the states but concerns vital matters impacting people's rights. This is especially so as the society gets more and more digitised in all areas. We welcome comments and feedback. The statement has been issued by the following Indian civil society organisations. Centre for Internet and Society<http://cis-india.org/>, Bangalore IT for Change<http://www.itforchange.net/>, Bangalore Free Software Movement of India<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_Software_Movement_of_India>, Hyderabad Society for Knowledge Commons<http://www.knowledgecommons.in/>, New Delhi Digital Empowerment Foundation<http://defindia.org/>, New Delhi Delhi Science Forum<http://www.delhiscienceforum.net/>, New Delhi Software Freedom Law Center India, New Delhi Third World Network - India<https://twnetwork.org/>, New Delhi It is supported by the following global networks: Association For Progressive Communications<https://www.apc.org/> Just Net Coalition <http://justnetcoalition.org/> <http://justnetcoalition.org/>We will soon expand this effort to enlist more global support. Best, Parminder <http://justnetcoalition.org/> <http://justnetcoalition.org/> <http://justnetcoalition.org/> <http://justnetcoalition.org/> Attachment:
Jurisdiction of ICANN.pdf |