[council] Re: Message from Chris Disspain regarding the IGO small group

[Heather Forrest <Heather.Forrest@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Mary,


Thank you very much for passing on this message from Chris. How can we get this 
information out to the wider community, because we were but few of many in the 
room to have heard the incorrect statements made in the previous session?


Best wishes,


Heather

________________________________
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of 
Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Friday, November 4, 2016 10:28:03 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Cc: Chris Disspain; Jamie Hedlund
Subject: [council] Message from Chris Disspain regarding the IGO small group

Dear Councilors,

Chris Disspain has asked that the note below be forwarded to you on his behalf.

Hello All,

I understand that statements are being made that the small discussion group on 
IGOs was set up by me.  That is not correct.  The Board through the New gTLD 
Program Committee asked me and Jamie Hedlund (acting as staff support) to enter 
into discussions with the IGOs through the GAC, in an attempt to establish what 
the possible solutions could be to the issue of IGO acronyms given that the 
NGPC told the GAC that its advice to reserve the IGO acronyms was problematic.

The existence of this effort has been discussed with the GNSO Council at a 
number of GNSO/Board meetings and also at ICANN public meetings.  These 
discussions included the logistics of the Board asking the GNSO to consider 
revising its policy recommendations along with explanations of the status of 
the discussions with IGOs.

I also understand that it has been suggested that Mary Wong was part of the 
small discussion group. That is incorrect.  Mary became involved recently to 
provide input on history and to help facilitate the discussions with the GNSO. 
In fact, to be clear, all staff were involved solely to facilitate the 
discussions and have played no substantive role.


Cheers,

Chris Disspain