<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] Message from Chris Disspain regarding the IGO small group
- To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] Message from Chris Disspain regarding the IGO small group
- From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 11:28:03 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: Chris Disspain <chris@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Jamie Hedlund <jamie.hedlund@xxxxxxxxx>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHSNo6BWf1wRiSVi0yiyU3FdlWv3Q==
- Thread-topic: Message from Chris Disspain regarding the IGO small group
- User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.1b.0.161010
Dear Councilors,
Chris Disspain has asked that the note below be forwarded to you on his behalf.
Hello All,
I understand that statements are being made that the small discussion group on
IGOs was set up by me. That is not correct. The Board through the New gTLD
Program Committee asked me and Jamie Hedlund (acting as staff support) to enter
into discussions with the IGOs through the GAC, in an attempt to establish what
the possible solutions could be to the issue of IGO acronyms given that the
NGPC told the GAC that its advice to reserve the IGO acronyms was problematic.
The existence of this effort has been discussed with the GNSO Council at a
number of GNSO/Board meetings and also at ICANN public meetings. These
discussions included the logistics of the Board asking the GNSO to consider
revising its policy recommendations along with explanations of the status of
the discussions with IGOs.
I also understand that it has been suggested that Mary Wong was part of the
small discussion group. That is incorrect. Mary became involved recently to
provide input on history and to help facilitate the discussions with the GNSO.
In fact, to be clear, all staff were involved solely to facilitate the
discussions and have played no substantive role.
Cheers,
Chris Disspain
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|