ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group

  • To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group
  • From: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 16:50:28 +0530
  • Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <8F0740CD-E9DA-41A1-8BE1-97AFD4A654CA@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <8F0740CD-E9DA-41A1-8BE1-97AFD4A654CA@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

As Keith says, I’m sure we all have full confidence that you acted fully 
appropriately for your role. 

David

> On 4 Nov. 2016, at 4:15 pm, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Dear Councilors,
>  
> Several statements were made during the GAC-GNSO meeting that just concluded, 
> concerning my role and participation in the IGO small group discussions. I 
> would like to let you know that I was only brought into the discussions after 
> the group was formed, to provide subject matter expertise and process advice 
> concerning the GNSO and its work. At no time did I participate other than as 
> a staff facilitator – and I did not hold myself out as a representative of 
> the GNSO, or as having any authority to negotiate on behalf of the GNSO 
> Council or the GNSO community.
>  
> Mary



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>