<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group
- To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] Statements made during the GAC-GNSO meeting about the role of ICANN staff in the IGO small group
- From: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2016 16:50:28 +0530
- Cc: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <8F0740CD-E9DA-41A1-8BE1-97AFD4A654CA@icann.org>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <8F0740CD-E9DA-41A1-8BE1-97AFD4A654CA@icann.org>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
As Keith says, I’m sure we all have full confidence that you acted fully
appropriately for your role.
David
> On 4 Nov. 2016, at 4:15 pm, Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Several statements were made during the GAC-GNSO meeting that just concluded,
> concerning my role and participation in the IGO small group discussions. I
> would like to let you know that I was only brought into the discussions after
> the group was formed, to provide subject matter expertise and process advice
> concerning the GNSO and its work. At no time did I participate other than as
> a staff facilitator – and I did not hold myself out as a representative of
> the GNSO, or as having any authority to negotiate on behalf of the GNSO
> Council or the GNSO community.
>
> Mary
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|