<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] FW: Board reply letter on IGO/RC issues and proposal on IGO acronyms protection from the IGO "small group"
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] FW: Board reply letter on IGO/RC issues and proposal on IGO acronyms protection from the IGO "small group"
- From: Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 7 Oct 2016 12:29:50 +0200
- In-reply-to: <ACB27581-7C59-4172-B030-C1003AC38A34@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <ACB27581-7C59-4172-B030-C1003AC38A34@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.3.0
James,
> If possible, we will add it as a discussion item under AOB.
Yes, please - I think we do need to discuss this as soon as
possible, and have a clear position.
Julf
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|