<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Motion on GNSO Review WG Draft Charter
- To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, GNSO council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Motion on GNSO Review WG Draft Charter
- From: Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 11 Jul 2016 21:05:19 +0000
- Accept-language: fr-FR, en-US
- In-reply-to: <5BE0E0B3AD494840A8B6F0332D6F0AD6@WUKPC>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <5BE0E0B3AD494840A8B6F0332D6F0AD6@WUKPC>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHR2634OKjx9C1YxU+/7huCbEWzs6ATuEOA
- Thread-topic: [council] Motion on GNSO Review WG Draft Charter
Dear All,
The motion has been posted on page:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+21+July+2016
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la
part de WUKnoben
Envoyé : lundi 11 juillet 2016 21:44
À : GNSO council
Objet : [council] Motion on GNSO Review WG Draft Charter
Dear Colleagues,
following from our discussion in Helsinki on how to proceed with the
implementation of the recommendations on GNSO review, please find attached a
related motion as well as a draft of the proposed charter for a GNSO Review
Working Group.
The idea is that this entity would on the one hand perform the review
implementation work and on the other hand within a timeframe to be defined
supersede the SCI by taking on board the related work. Since two options for
this “handover” seem to be feasible – either directly after the SCI has
finished its remaining tasks on the table at present or after the WG has
finished its review implementation tasks – both options are offered for
discussion in the motion as well as in the draft charter.
I look forward to your feedback.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|