RE: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team

["Paul McGrady" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Marika.  I think we have to go more granular than just the C', SG's
etc.  For example, INTA put in public comments.  They are a member of the
IPC and a therefore a member of the GNSO community.

 

Best,

Paul

 

 

From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Marika Konings
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2016 7:59 AM
To: James M. Bladel; Paul McGrady; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team

 

I believe Bruce just answered question #1. With regards to bullet 3:

*       IPC -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-new-bylaws-21apr16/msg00028.html
*       NCSG -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-new-bylaws-21apr16/msg00022.html
*       BC -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-new-bylaws-21apr16/msg00024.html
*       ISPCP -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-new-bylaws-21apr16/msg00012.html
*       RySG -
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-new-bylaws-21apr16/msg00011.html

Best regards,

 

Marika

 

Marika Konings

Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet Corporation for
Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 

Email: marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx  

 

Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO

Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive courses
<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso>  and visiting the GNSO Newcomer pages
<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-
efforts.htm#newcomers> .

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of "James M. Bladel"
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sunday 22 May 2016 at 13:35
To: Paul McGrady <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx"
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team

 

Hi Paul -

 

Thanks for kicking this off.  Generally, I'm good with this letter.  A few
questions/comments:

*       Given the compressed timeline, can we ask Staff to confirm whether
or not the Drafting Team will have an opportunity to amend the proposed
bylaws before submitting to the Board?  I'm assuming they will, but.
*       Should we also cc: the Board and/or CCWG Co-Chairs? (hedge)
*       With the Comment Period now closed, could we task someone from
Policy Staff to assist Paul in gathering links to GNSO comments?
*       The Board is meeting this week to consider the draft bylaws.  It is
therefore imperative that we move quickly to get this sent.  Councilors,
please send edits/comments/concerns by EOD (Pacific) Monday to ensure that
this is posted overnight Tuesday.

Thanks again-

 

J.

 

From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of Paul McGrady
<policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Saturday, May 21, 2016 at 6:01 
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Proposed letter to the Drafting Team

 

Hi all,

 

On our last call, I volunteered t draft a short letter from James to the
Bylaws Drafting Team.  Here is the proposed body of that letter to be kicked
around the Council list:

 

________

 

Dear Bylaws Drafting Team:

 

The GNSO Council thanks you for your efforts in attempting to distill the
instructions found in the CCWG-Accountability Report into a revised version
of ICANN's Bylaws.  We note that the draft Bylaws have generated significant
public comment from members of the GNSO community.  These include:

 

 

[Paul McGrady to pull these links out of the public comment after it closes]

 

We ask you to carefully review each of these comments and give them serious
consideration.  It is important that the revised Bylaws remain faithful to
the CCWG-Accountability Report on which we, as a Council, were called upon
to vote in Marrakech.  We are fully at your disposal should you wish to
consult us on any issue raised in the comments generated by the GNSO
community.

 

Kind regards,

James Bladel

 

 

 

Best,

Paul

policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx