Re: [council] WSIS session on new gTLDs

[Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Marika,

Thank you for seeking further clarification and thanks to the GDD for
providing this information. This is reassuring indeed. I would like to
reinforce my suggestion, however, that the reframing and amendment of the
session is discussed with the co-chairs of the new gTLD subsequent
procedures WG to make sure the two processes (the Reviews and the work of
the WG) are covered.

Thanks
Marília

On Fri, Apr 1, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

> Marilia, all,
>
> I received some further feedback that the original title was inserted as a
> placeholder and that it will be amended to ensure the focus is on the
> review process itself. I hope that addresses your concern?
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marika
>
> From: Marilia Maciel <mariliamaciel@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday 29 March 2016 at 13:47
> To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: Re: [council] WSIS session on new gTLDs
>
> Dear all,
>
> Thank you very much, Marika, for proving this information. The WSIS Forum
> is the largest meeting on ICT for development and one of the major events
> in the Internet Governance calendar, in which UN organisations and all
> stakeholders get together to review the implementation of the goals set
> forth by the World Summit on the Information Society. Sessions have
> considerable visibility and attendance.
>
> I see the presence of ICANN in this meeting with very positive eyes. It is
> very important to dialogue with other organisations in the internet
> ecosystem. However, I find that the framing of this particular session is
> not adequate, as it seems to take for granted the work that we are doing in
> the GNSO, particularly in the WG on new gTLD subsequent procedures.
>
> I understand that GDD may want to talk about the lessons learned from a
> staff standpoint (taking into consideration the reviews that have been
> commissioned), but these reviews should be an element to be fed into the
> policy development process, which is the right mechanism to identify
> lessons learned in a holistic manner and define the way forward.
>
> The GNSO is still in the process of drawing lessons from the first round
> and defining if a second round is desirable and what should be improved for
> it to take place in a smooth manner. I do not think we can say that "ICANN
> has embarked on a preparation for the second round", before the GNSO takes
> its time to develop policy. I understand the wish to "heat" the market for
> new gTLDs, however, this framing is just inaccurate and undermines the role
> of the GNSO from an internal policy perspective and from a public relations
> standpoint.
>
> I would like to suggest that we include this update we have received from
> staff in the agenda of the next GNSO call. I would also like to suggest, on
> a personal capacity, that GDD considers withdrawing the proposal or
> changing the framing of this session in order for it to reflect the stage
> of discussions that we find ourselves now. If the second option is
> preferred, it would be good that GDD works together with the chairs of the
> WG on new gTLD subsequent procedures to reframe and organize this session.
>
> Thanks and best wishes,
> Marília
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 6:29 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> There was a request during the GNSO Council wrap up session to obtain
>> further information about the new gTLD Session that had been submitted by
>> ICANN to take place during the WSIS Forum which takes place from 2-6 May in
>> Geneva, Switzerland. This session is currently scheduled for 2 May from
>> 14.30 –16.15 (see Draft Agenda (as of 24/03/2016)
>> <https://www.itu.int/net4/wsis/forum/2016/Content/documents/agenda/WSISForum_2016_DraftAgenda_2016-03-24.pdf>)
>>  and
>> is titled 'the gTLD Programme: Looking Forward to a Future Application
>> Round'. The request for this session noted that 'The Workshop will
>> explore and discuss the lessons learned from the 1st Round of gTLD
>> applications which took place in 2012 and will look forward to the process
>> ICANN has embarked on in preparation for a 2nd Round of applications’. The
>> responsible staff will now start to scope out this session following the
>> approval of the ITU of the request.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Marika
>>
>
>
>
> --
> *Marília Maciel*
> Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
> Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
> School
> http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
> DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
> PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/
>
>
>


-- 
*Marília Maciel*
Pesquisadora Gestora - Centro de Tecnologia e Sociedade - FGV Direito Rio
Researcher and Coordinator - Center for Technology & Society - FGV Law
School
http://direitorio.fgv.br/cts
DiploFoundation associate - www.diplomacy.edu
PoliTICs Magazine Advisory Committee - http://www.politics.org.br/