<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
- To: "'James M. Bladel'" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'WUKnoben'" <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Marika Konings'" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
- From: "Paul McGrady \(Policy\)" <policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 06:23:07 -0600
- In-reply-to: <D305BD07.B29DA%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <D305969B.65ACC%marika.konings@icann.org> <7BF1B924D9464A5DAE232F82CB38D122@WUKPC> <D305BD07.B29DA%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQHnuB8/i1O69LawFd03t0+GZPY2wAI/kqSGAkw2ipKfAC1+UA==
Hi James & Co.,
Does our Transmittal letter need to indicate the GNSO's interest in
participating as a Decisional member? The GAC's letter does. I'm not sure
if/when we have to make that clear. Sure would hate to not say it here, and
be out in the cold for eternity. Question though: have we asked this
question of the GNSO? I assume it would be a resounding yes, but I don't
know if we have to actually ask that question of our stakeholders before we
answer it.
Steve D. seems to be the high priest of this proposal. Should we ask him?
Best,
Paul
Paul McGrady
policy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
+1-312-882-5020
GNSO Councilor for the IPC
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 05:46 AM
To: WUKnoben; Marika Konings; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
Hi Wolf-Ulrich -
I'll let Marika respond to your first question.
With regard to your second point, I think you are correct. Regarding
statements, my only asks were that (1) the statement clearly indicate
whether it is on behalf of an SG/C, or an individual Councilor, and (2) that
statements be submitted in writing or briefly summarized (1-2 sentences),
rather than read in their entirety.
Thanks-
J.
From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of WUKnoben
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 11:38
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
Thanks Marika,
1. shouldn't it read at the beginning of the letter "On behalf of the GNSO
..." since the GNSO is the chartering organization, not the council?
2. I understood yesterday that accompanying statements shall be provided by
constituencies as well as individual council members.
Best regards
Wolf-Ulrich
From: Marika Konings <mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 9:00 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
Dear All,
As discussed yesterday, please find attached for your review the draft
transmittal letter to the CCWG-Accountability Chairs which would be sent
following the vote later this afternoon.
Best regards,
Marika
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|