ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter

  • To: WUKnoben <wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
  • From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2016 11:46:04 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Authentication-results: t-online.de; dkim=none (message not signed) header.d=none;t-online.de; dmarc=none action=none header.from=godaddy.com;
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=secureservernet.onmicrosoft.com; s=selector1-godaddy-com; h=From:To:Date:Subject:Message-ID:Content-Type:MIME-Version; bh=fVDzsV08kETEjvDzVRLEtpCFHJxkh7U3Iq4xQX3fmx8=; b=6D0eTj/SV34n5msALnht10h/qNEB4izJnvB/m+R1DwfcbQNCQJMVMTdrschar9jXhYCZq9eokgfdDvLQs84WIxQXq6uREjELJ2X2cUYYLvRNnwJ9mVbt8oB2GENgBgxwWbfC5vqm8emI/7MT+eh4fR7zOOB3iT7Dt0w/Ls2ipnQ=
  • In-reply-to: <7BF1B924D9464A5DAE232F82CB38D122@WUKPC>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <D305969B.65ACC%marika.konings@icann.org> <7BF1B924D9464A5DAE232F82CB38D122@WUKPC>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Spamdiagnosticmetadata: NSPM
  • Spamdiagnosticoutput: 1:23
  • Thread-index: AQHReeIgU58d7ckPd02If653hW72HZ9Q/J4AgAACGIA=
  • Thread-topic: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter
Hi Wolf-Ulrich -

I'll let Marika respond to your first question.

With regard to your second point, I think you are correct. Regarding 
statements, my only asks were that (1) the statement clearly indicate whether 
it is on behalf of an SG/C, or an individual Councilor, and (2) that statements 
be submitted in writing or briefly summarized (1-2 sentences), rather than read 
in their entirety.

Thanks-

J.


From: <owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> on 
behalf of WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Reply-To: WUKnoben 
<wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:wolf-ulrich.knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 at 11:38
To: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter

Thanks Marika,

1. shouldn't it read at the beginning of the letter "On behalf of the GNSO ..." 
since the GNSO is the chartering organization, not the council?
2. I understood yesterday that accompanying statements shall be provided by 
constituencies as well as individual council members.

Best regards

Wolf-Ulrich


From: Marika Konings<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Wednesday, March 9, 2016 9:00 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] For your review - draft transmittal letter

Dear All,

As discussed yesterday, please find attached for your review the draft 
transmittal letter to the CCWG-Accountability Chairs which would be sent 
following the vote later this afternoon.

Best regards,

Marika
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>