ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] RE: Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

  • To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] RE: Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal
  • From: "McGrady, Paul D." <PMcGrady@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:20:41 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Deferred-delivery: Thu, 14 Jan 2016 14:20:00 +0000
  • In-reply-to: <88EE077F-5223-49B1-91B7-A98C646C9514@icann.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <88EE077F-5223-49B1-91B7-A98C646C9514@icann.org>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQHRTtVXWYx4aM0BWE2Lnr916JKOTZ77Dy3g
  • Thread-topic: Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Thanks Mary.  Just a quick question on Rec 9.  Why would there need to be a 
review of whether or not to include the IPC comments?  Everyone else’s comments 
were included, so I don’t know why the IPCs would be subject to a review to see 
if they would be included.  Thanks for your thoughts.

Best,
Paul



From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Thursday, January 14, 2016 8:17 AM
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [council] Action items from GNSO Council call on 17 January regarding 
the CCWG-Accountability Third Draft Proposal

Dear all,

Here are the notes that staff took in relation to action items stemming from 
the Special GNSO Council meeting that just concluded. Please let us know if we 
have missed or mischaracterized anything.

ACTION ITEMS:

  *   Letter explaining GNSO Council response - James to prepare draft for 
Council consideration before 21 January, assisted by Keith and Ed
  *   Rec 5, 11 - James to draft additional language along the lines of what 
was discussed/agreed on the call, assisted by Ed and Paul
  *   Rec 1 - reinsert BC note about strong right of inspection (perhaps with 
cross-reference in/to Rec 3?)
  *   Rec 2 - change "unanimous support" to "broad support"
  *   Rec 3, 4 - no change
  *   Rec 6 - remove last sentence; add note that certain questions remain to 
be resolved in WS2
  *   Rec 7 - no change
  *   Rec 8 – further elaboration needed on note about timeliness (including 
replies and deadlines)
  *   Rec 9 - Review whether IPC comment on AOC section 8(b) and direct 
constituency participation in review teams should be included; review generally 
for accuracy
  *   Rec 10 - emphasize need for it to be a community-led effort
  *   Rec 12 - no change
Staff will follow up with James and the various Council volunteers to ensure 
that you have the updates as soon as practicable.

Thanks and cheers
Mary


Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
Telephone: +1-603-5744889

The contents of this message may be privileged and confidential. Therefore, if 
this message has been received in error, please delete it without reading it. 
Your receipt of this message is not intended to waive any applicable privilege. 
Please do not disseminate this message without the permission of the author.


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>