Re: [council] Motion for GNSO Consideration of the CCWG Accountability Third Draft Report

[Johan Helsingius <julf@xxxxxxxx>]

On 14/01/16 12:17, McGrady, Paul D. wrote:

> Saying that there is “limited support with some opposition” also sends the 
> wrong
> message on Recommendation 11 since there is strong, broad-based opposition to
> the Recommendation /as written/ and the CCWG may think they are OK to ignore
> “some opposition” when, in fact, it appears that the Recommendation /as 
> written
> /needs a major overhaul to get close to acceptable.

I agree with Paul, and yes, we do need the “Little to no support with
strong opposition” category.

        Julf