Re: [council] FW: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal

["Edward Morris" <egmorris1@xxxxxxxxx>]

Hi James,


Thanks for all of your hard work on this.

There is a mistake in the links section of your letter to the CCWG Chairs. The 
Non-Commercial Stakeholders Group (NCSG) and the Non-Commercial Users 
Constituency (NCUC) submitted separate public comments. They are both 
attributed, below, to the NCUC. The NCSG statement was drafted with 
participation of members of both the NCUC and NPOC and was endorsed by the 
policy committee of the NCSG, which consists  of representatives of both 
constituencies. The NCUC and NPOC statements  were drafted by and endorsed by 
the appropriate committees of each constituency.

Although similar in content (as are to each other the three statements 
submitted by members of the Commercial Stakeholders Group) there are 
differences between the three noncommercial comments that should be 
acknowledged and properly respected as we begin the process of consolidation. I 
realize that it is rare for the three non-commercial entities to all submit 
comments on a topic yet when there are differences in approach, such as here, 
it does happen. 

I would respectfully request that your letter be corrected and re-sent. I 
certainly don't want the Chairs or one of us to skip over a full set of 
comments on the mistaken belief that the NCUC sent the same set of comments to 
the list in different forms when, in fact, that is not the case. One of the 
comments attributed to the NCUC is actually a submission by the NCSG.

Thanks,

Ed Morris


Sent from my iPhone

> On Dec 24, 2015, at 5:03 PM, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> For your information.
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Marika
> 
> From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 10:55
> To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía <leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>, Mathieu Weill 
> <mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx>, Thomas Rickert <thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>, Alice Jansen 
> <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal
> 
> Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:
> 
> CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
> Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal
> 24 DEC 2015
> 
> 
> Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:
> 
> Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period 
> covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to 
> the size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the 
> compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to 
> the 12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment 
> period.
> 
> Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf 
> of GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs).  Additional 
> submissions were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that 
> participate in the GNSO from within one or more SG/C.  We have formed a team 
> tasked with analyzing these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized 
> position for consideration by the GNSO Council in a special session convening 
> on 14 January 2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will 
> be transmitted to you immediately following this session.
> 
> Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in 
> shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year.  We are 
> very near the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our 
> thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.
> 
> Thank you,
> 
> James Bladel
> GNSO Chair
> 
> 
> Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html
> 
> Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html
> 
> Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder 
> Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html
> 
> Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html
> 
> Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html
> 
> Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Comment - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html
> 
> Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
> Survey Response - 
> http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html
> 
>