[council] FW: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal

[Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>]

For your information.

Best regards,

Marika

From: Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Thursday 24 December 2015 at 10:55
To: León Felipe Sánchez Ambía 
<leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx<mailto:leonfelipe@xxxxxxxxxx>>, Mathieu Weill 
<mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx<mailto:mathieu.weill@xxxxxxxx>>, Thomas Rickert 
<thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:thomas@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: Grace Abuhamad <grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:grace.abuhamad@xxxxxxxxx>>, 
Alice Jansen <alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:alice.jansen@xxxxxxxxx>>, "James M. 
Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: GNSO review of Third Draft Proposal

Sending on behalf of James Bladel, GNSO Chair:

CCWG-ACCT Co-Chairs
Re: GNSO Review of Third Draft Proposal
24 DEC 2015


Dear Mathieu, Thomas, and Leon:

Earlier this week, 21 Dec 2015, marked the close of the Public Comment period 
covering the Third CCWG-Accountability Draft Proposal. Unfortunately, due to 
the size and diversity of the organizations that comprise the GNSO, and the 
compressed time frame, we were unable to develop a unified GNSO response to the 
12 Recommendations of the CCWG-Accountability by the close of the comment 
period.

Listed below are links to comments and survey responses submitted on behalf of 
GNSO Stakeholder Groups (SGs) and Constituencies (Cs).  Additional submissions 
were made on behalf of individuals and organizations that participate in the 
GNSO from within one or more SG/C.  We have formed a team tasked with analyzing 
these responses, and using them to draft a harmonized position for 
consideration by the GNSO Council in a special session convening on 14 January 
2016 Presuming this position is successfully adopted, it will be transmitted to 
you immediately following this session.

Once again, please accept our gratitude for dedication and patience in 
shepherding this enormous and historic work unit over the past year.  We are 
very near the finish line, and look forward to further contributing our 
thoughts to this document, and the Final CCWG-Accountability Proposal.

Thank you,

James Bladel
GNSO Chair


Registry Stakeholder Group (RySG):
Comment - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00035.html
Survey Response - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00034.html

Registrar Stakeholder Group (RrSG)
Comment - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00084.html

Intellectual Property Interests Constituency (IPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00100.html

Internet Service Providers Constituency (ISPC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
Survey Response - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00046.html

Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC), Commercial Stakeholder Group
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00064.html

Non-Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Comment - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00069.html
Survey Response - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00076.html

Non-Profit Organizations Constituency (NPOC), Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group
Survey Response - 
http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-draft-ccwg-accountability-proposal-30nov15/msg00051.html