ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Motion for Council Meeting in Buenos Aires

  • To: Council GNSO <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Motion for Council Meeting in Buenos Aires
  • From: Bret Fausett <bret@xxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2015 09:48:52 -0700
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Dear Councillors,

I am pleased to make the following motion for consideration at the next Council 
Meeting on 24 June 2015. A copy of the Motion with links to the referenced 
historical documents is attached to this email as a Word Document. I also am 
including as PDFs copies of the attachments. Please let me know if you have any 
difficulties receiving or opening the attached documents. 

As a brief background, the work described in the motion and presented below in 
the attachments was primarily a scoping exercise, to provide a starting 
framework for future policy development work on new gTLDs. If we approve the 
motion and begin the policy process, the actual policy work will be done in a 
future working group. I would also welcome the opportunity to address any 
questions about the motion or the history of the discussion group on this 
mailing list in advance of the meeting.

Looking forward to seeing you all in Buenos Aires,

     Bret Fausett



= = = = = START = = = = =

Motion to Request a Preliminary Issue Report on New gTLDs Subsequent Rounds

Whereas,

1. In 2005, this Council of the Generic Names Supporting Organization (GNSO) 
began a policy development process to consider the introduction of new gTLDs, 
which resulted in the creation of certain policy recommendations for the launch 
of a new gTLD application process; and,

2. In September 2007, this Council adopted the policy recommendations from the 
GNSO policy development process and forwarded them to the ICANN Board of 
Directors; and,

3. The Final Report stated that “ This policy development process has been 
designed to produce a systemised and ongoing mechanism for applicants to 
propose new top-level domains.” 

4. In June 2008, the ICANN Board adopted the GNSO's policy recommendations for 
the introduction of new gTLDs and directed staff to develop an implementation 
plan for a new gTLD introduction process; and

5. In June 2011, the ICANN Board approved an Application Guidebook ("AGB") for 
new gTLDs and authorized the launch of the New gTLD Program; and,

6. In June 2012, the first round application submission period closed; and,

7. In June 2014, this Council created the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures 
Discussion Group (DG) to discuss experiences gained and lessons learned from 
the 2012 New gTLD round and identify subjects for future issue reports, that 
may lead to changes or adjustments for subsequent procedures; and,

8. In August 2014, the DG began deliberations, focusing primarily on the 
identification of issues that members experienced in the 2012 New gTLD round; 
and,
9. In November 2014, the ICANN Board provided initial input on areas for 
possible policy work in Annex A related to a resolution on Planning for Future 
gTLD Application Rounds.

10. The DG developed a matrix which attempts to associate identified issues 
with a corresponding principle, policy recommendation or implementation 
guidance from the 2007 Final Report on New Generic Top-Level Domains, or to 
note that the issue may warrant new policy work. Furthermore, the DG developed 
a draft PDP WG charter that identifies subjects, divided into provisional 
groupings, for further analysis in a potential Issue Report and potential PDP; 
and,

11. The DG recommends that its set of deliverables serve as the basis for 
analysis in a single Issue Report.

Now therefore, it is resolved:

1. The GNSO Council requests a single Issue Report that will analyze subjects 
that may lead to changes or adjustments for subsequent New gTLD Procedures. The 
Preliminary Issue Report should at a minimum consider:

• The subjects that the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Discussion Group 
identified in its deliverables (i.e., issues matrix and draft charter);
• Global Domains Division Staff input to the deliberations of the DG, and;
• The ICANN Board Resolution Annex A regarding Initial Input on Areas for 
Possible Policy Work

2. In addition to covering the required elements of an Issue Report, ICANN 
Staff is also requested to provide options on how the subjects may be organized 
and worked through in a potential future PDP.

= = = = = END = = = = =

Attachment: New gTLDs Subsequent Rounds Draft Motion_10Jun2015.docx
Description: Microsoft Office

Attachment: Request for Issue Report_New gTLD Subsequent Procedures.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document

Attachment: New gTLD Discussion Group Final Deliverables.pdf
Description: Adobe PDF document







<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>