ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

[council] Beyond the Contract: Partnering to Strengthen Business and Consumer Protections

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: [council] Beyond the Contract: Partnering to Strengthen Business and Consumer Protections
  • From: Bruce Tonkin <Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 12 Apr 2015 00:23:06 +0000
  • Accept-language: en-AU, en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AdB0stOdbYLQV2NUQSCBNjs445GTzwAA++IQ
  • Thread-topic: Beyond the Contract: Partnering to Strengthen Business and Consumer Protections

Hello All

This blog post from Allen Grogen at  
https://www.icann.org/news/blog/beyond-the-contract-partnering-to-strengthen-business-and-consumer-protections
 maybe of interest.

Recently ICANN received a formal letter 
[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/shatan-to-atallah-27mar15-en.pdf
 ] from Gregory Shatan, President of ICANN's Intellectual Property Constituency 
(IPC), on behalf of the IPC, asking us to halt the rollout of .SUCKS, a new 
gTLD operated by Vox Populi Registry Inc.   In the letter, the IPC described 
the proposed business practices and actions of Vox Populi as "illicit" and 
"predatory, exploitive and coercive."   As responsible stewards of the 
Internet, we take these allegations seriously.

ICANN's enforcement ability lies within a contractual framework.   We can 
enforce the terms and conditions of our contracts with registries, but it is 
the responsibility of governmental regulatory agencies, law enforcement and the 
courts to police illegal activity.   ICANN is not a regulator and we have 
limited expertise or authority to assess the legality of Vox Populi's 
activities.

Due to the serious nature of the allegations, we have sent letters 
[https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/jeffrey-to-ramirez-knubley-09apr15-en.pdf
 ] to both the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and, because Vox Populi is a 
Canadian enterprise, Canada's Office of Consumer Affairs (OCA) asking them to 
consider assessing and determining whether or not Vox Populi is violating any 
of the laws or regulations those agencies enforce.   ICANN is currently 
evaluating remedies available to us under the registry agreement.   As we noted 
in those letters, if Vox Populi is not complying with all applicable laws, it 
may also be in breach of its registry agreement.   ICANN could then act 
consistently with its public interest goals and consumer and business 
protections to change these practices through our contractual relationship with 
the registry.

When I was appointed to the position of Chief Contract Compliance Officer last 
October, I made a commitment to look for ways that ICANN can help safeguard 
Internet users and registrants that may go beyond the contractual enforcement 
tasks for which we are responsible.   Asking the FTC and OCA for their 
assistance in this matter is one example of how we can work with others to 
strengthen our consumer and business protections and enhance our ability to 
meet public interest goals.   Let's continue to work together as a 
multistakeholder community to build trust and advance the reputation of our 
industry.




<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>