<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
- To: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Carlos Raúl G. <crg@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
- From: "Reed, Daniel A" <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2015 15:03:02 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Cc: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Tony Holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <D1109F65.94A65%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <009c01d04ed7$4192f6b0$c4b8e410$@btinternet.com> <5145D126-FE8F-4C77-9174-BF1D280E3DED@difference.com.au> <00ca01d04f5c$f99c25d0$ecd47170$@afilias.info> <00d601d04f5e$7e6edfe0$7b4c9fa0$@afilias.info> <49CE6EBC-98FD-4241-A108-59FFE2B7CE59@isoc-cr.org> <D1109F65.94A65%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdBO1z2/KzMUvhwTTzm30NaADmsQKgArAJyAAAMA5oAAAGEogAAEsQmAAAKNtwAAieFWcA==
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
I am fine with this
Dan
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 9:15 AM
To: Carlos Raúl G. ; <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: David Cake; Tony Holmes; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Hi folks:
I made a very minor tweak to Jonathan's version. Hopefully this is acceptable
to all.
Summary -Modified the last line to read:
"Given it's co-ordination and policy management role within the GNSO, the GNSO
Council remains committed assisting the work within CWG, CCWG and the ICG in
order that the community may ultimately deliver a sound, comprehensive and
consensus proposal for the transition of the IANA function and one that will
uphold the principles set forth in the NTIA announcement, and fully meet the
needs of the global Internet community."
I also note that the entire final paragraph is a single sentence, but this
doesn't bother me so long as everyone else is ok with it! :)
Thanks!
J.
From: "Carlos Raúl G." <crg@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:crg@xxxxxxxxxxx>>
Date: Monday, February 23, 2015 at 8:01
To: "<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>"
<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Cc: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, Tony
Holmes <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>, GNSO
Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Excelent statement
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176 (New Number)
Enviado desde mi iPhone
El feb 23, 2015, a las 5:47, Jonathan Robinson
<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>> escribió:
Attached in .pdf if easier to read on some devices.
Jonathan
From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 February 2015 11:37
To: 'David Cake'; 'Tony Holmes';
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Thanks Tony & Avri,
Please see my suggested edits contained in the attached redline version.
Jonathan
From: David Cake [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 February 2015 10:11
To: Tony Holmes; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> List
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
I would be happy to support that statement.
David
On 23 Feb 2015, at 3:39 am, Tony Holmes
<tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Jonathan/All
Attached is the draft statement compiled by Avri and I on the IANA transition
process.
Comments welcome.
Regards
Tony
<GNSO statement on the IANA transition - draft.zip>
<GNSO statement on the IANA transition - draft.docx>
<GNSO statement on the IANA transition - draft (3).pdf>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|