<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
- To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'David Cake'" <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Tony Holmes'" <tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
- From: Phil Corwin <psc@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2015 22:59:12 +0000
- Accept-language: en-US
- Importance: high
- In-reply-to: <00d601d04f5e$7e6edfe0$7b4c9fa0$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <009c01d04ed7$4192f6b0$c4b8e410$@btinternet.com> <5145D126-FE8F-4C77-9174-BF1D280E3DED@difference.com.au> <00ca01d04f5c$f99c25d0$ecd47170$@afilias.info> <00d601d04f5e$7e6edfe0$7b4c9fa0$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AdBO1z2/KzMUvhwTTzm30NaADmsQKgAo6CuAAAMA5oAAAGEogAAMvtNA
- Thread-topic: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Jonathan:
Members of the Business Constituency seem to be generally supportive of the
sentiments contained in the draft Statement. However, I am being asked two
questions in regard to it:
1. What is the overall purpose of issuing the Statement?
2. What is the effect of a Constituency endorsing the statement - and, in
particular, does it replace the views of any constituency or SG or preclude a
more nuanced and detailed future statement by them?
Once I have those answers I should be able to indicate whether the BC can
support and/or be listed as a signatory.
Thanks and best regards,
Philip
PS-This paragraph of the Statement, as modified by you and James, has two typos:
"Given [it's] its co-ordination and policy management role within the GNSO, the
GNSO Council remains committed to assisting the work within CWG, CCWG and the
ICG in order that the community may ultimately deliver a sound, comprehensive
and consensus proposal for the transition of the IANA function and one that
will uphold the principles set forth in the NTIA announcement, and fully meet
the needs of the global Internet community."
Philip S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw LLC
1155 F Street, NW
Suite 1050
Washington, DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/cell
Twitter: @VlawDC
"Luck is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Robinson
Sent: Monday, February 23, 2015 6:47 AM
To: 'David Cake'; 'Tony Holmes'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Attached in .pdf if easier to read on some devices.
Jonathan
From: Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 February 2015 11:37
To: 'David Cake'; 'Tony Holmes';
council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
Thanks Tony & Avri,
Please see my suggested edits contained in the attached redline version.
Jonathan
From: David Cake [mailto:dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 February 2015 10:11
To: Tony Holmes; <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> List
Subject: Re: [council] Draft GNSO statement on IANA transition
I would be happy to support that statement.
David
On 23 Feb 2015, at 3:39 am, Tony Holmes
<tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:tonyarholmes@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:
Jonathan/All
Attached is the draft statement compiled by Avri and I on the IANA transition
process.
Comments welcome.
Regards
Tony
<GNSO statement on the IANA transition - draft.zip>
________________________________
No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com<http://www.avg.com>
Version: 2015.0.5646 / Virus Database: 4284/9131 - Release Date: 02/17/15
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|