ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation

  • To: "Avri Doria" <avri@xxxxxxx>, owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation
  • From: gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sun, 2 Nov 2014 14:43:04 +0000
  • Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=message-id:reply-to:references:in-reply-to:sensitivity:importance :subject:to:from:date:content-type:mime-version; bh=p+EizvWMWSUpaVDxLYNvYZ2VtOvk7T/BVdFr+Oln3VY=; b=Qi990yVAPBqadJj5pF1jl9zwur6bUIc13OCyva4TjcYxcJxRverCL/vwBF/iqZETCS IVYuTUoXmjo2RC0ypyU7mu/bFJJxVVeuvSCQnmTD4Mc+UT88tJlBjpIQ+tsPosK1/986 FBMNOAgJPt3NFlmiVXq2419q21m7z+IP1npU9Gu/CamDgxF1GD/fFI8E7OqELS7Elny+ x3UsxlLD4AY0ib1TEn4GHwonZaZcmu+JF9beeFWORkhV952FVt77fWlJqwZL9EaHiOm9 L7jbmzjVWwp0OzUyV3vBdrgPa9YOEcHf+3ghoRLAoBOluMSEJxvZ6gNSmPFsXV2IeAzi KypQ==
  • Importance: Normal
  • In-reply-to: <5455CB9E.4030308@acm.org>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <5455CB9E.4030308@acm.org>
  • Reply-to: gabrielaszlak@xxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sensitivity: Normal

Thanks Avri,

I second the motion.

Gabi


Sent with a mobile device

-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2014 15:13:50 
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] Motions for SCI recommendation

Hi,

The attached  motion has been prepared by the supporting staff on behalf
of the SCI for the upcoming GNSO Council meeting.  I have reviewed it
and submit it in my name as liaison to the SCI from the Council.  The
motion still needs a second.

The recommendations are in response to GNSO council requests to the SCI
and relate to:
- mechanism for waiver of the 10 day motion rule
- mechanism for voting outside a GNSO council meeting
- and a footnote relating to consensus levels against a proposal

The SCI reached full consensus on these recommendations.  They have been
the subject of a comment period, though no comments were received.

I recommend approval of these recommendations.

Thanks

avri





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>