<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Updated GNSO Council Agenda 25 September 2014 at 18:00 UTC
Thanks Amr,
The way the agenda gets put together is that I typically build a first draft
based on the previous meeting and my knowledge of anything that is coming
up.
This is then shared with council vice-chairs and staff who then contribute
and shape the agenda prior to a first draft being circulated with the
Council.
Priority is always given to motions before the Council and any councillor
is welcome to make a motion at any time before the cut-off date (23h59UTC,
10 days before the meeting).
Other items are added based on proposals from Councillors that gain some
support.
In the case of the CCWG-IG, I have raised it for discussion previously and
formally placed it on the agenda as a discussion item at the last meeting.
As you correctly note, it received no comment or discussion last time
around.
Like you, I have heard that other groups have not yet adopted the charter
and that there is some frustration on the part of the WG participants.
I suspect that some of this is simply down to volume of work and possibly a
question of what is most urgent and / or important to focus on.
Hope that helps some.
Jonathan
From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 23 September 2014 09:01
To: Council GNSO
Subject: Re: [council] Updated GNSO Council Agenda 25 September 2014 at
18:00 UTC
Hi,
I see the CCWG-IG charter is still not on the agenda. The way I see it (and
since the WG is asking for GNSO endorsement of the charter), we can either
eventually vote on this charter, or after a discussion, decide that we have
problems with it. These problems should be identified and communicated to
the WG to determine wether they would consider amending the charter
accordingly. This discussion could take place over email, and not
necessarily during a council meeting.
I keep bringing this up because the WG leadership has expressed some
frustration over the lack of response on our part (as well as others), and
also because some NCSG members on that WG would also like to see this issue
moved along.
I recall that when this was a discussion topic during our last meeting,
there were no comments offered.
I believe the most recent version of the charter can be found here:
https://community.icann.org/display/CPMMB/Charter+Version+3.2
Thanks.
Amr
On Sep 23, 2014, at 9:21 AM, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dear Councillors,
Please find the updated GNSO Council Agenda for the meeting on 25 September
2014 at 18:00 UTC.
The updates are as follows:
Item 7: UPDATE ?C Subsequent rounds of new gTLDs ?C status report (15 mins)
A link to the
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/presentation-new-gtld-subsequent-22
sep14-en.pdf> detailed report received from Karen Lentz
And an additional item under:
Item 11: Any Other Business (5 mins)
11.1 ?C Input from Jennifer Wolfe on the GNSO Review including Survey
participation.
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
Procedures approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
< <http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf >
For convenience:
* An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is
provided in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
* An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the
absentee voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this
agenda.
Meeting Times 18:00 UTC:
<http://tinyurl.com/qek29ro> http://tinyurl.com/qek29ro
Coordinated Universal Time 18:00 UTC
11:00 Los Angeles; 14:00 Washington; 19:00 London; 20:00 Brussels; 02:00
Perth
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councillors
should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
GNSO Council meeting audiocast
<http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u>
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Item 1: Administrative matters (5 mins)
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the
GNSO Operating Procedures:
Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 4 September 2014 will be posted as
approved on xxxxxxx 2014
Item 2: Opening Remarks / Review of Projects & Action List (10 mins)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include review of <http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf>
Projects List and
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>
Action List.
Comments or questions arising.
Item 3: Consent agenda (5 mins)
Item 4: DISCUSSION ?C A letter to the ICANN NGPC regarding the proposed
modification of GNSO consensus recommendations relating to IGO acronyms and
Red Cross identifiers (10 mins)
On 10 November 2013 the PDP Working Group (IGO-INGO PDP WG) delivered its
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/igo-ingo-final-10nov13-en.pdf> Final Report
to the GNSO Council that included twenty-five consensus recommendations. On
20 November 2013 the GNSO Council unanimously
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20131120-2> adopted all
twenty-five consensus recommendations of the IGO-INGO PDP WG and forwarded
them to the ICANN Board in January 2014 with a recommendation for their
adoption.
On 30 April 2014 the Board
<https://www.icann.org/resources/board-material/resolutions-2014-04-30-en>
resolved to adopt those of the GNSO's recommendations that are not
inconsistent with GAC advice, and to facilitate dialogue between the
affected parties in order to reconcile the remaining differences, as further
detailed in
<https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-annex-a-30apr14
-en.pdf> Annex A and
<https://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/resolutions-annex-b-30apr14
-en.pdf> Annex Bof the Board's resolution. The GNSO's recommendations and
GAC advice are largely consistent except in relation to the duration and
mechanism of protection for IGO acronyms and the full names and acronyms of
189 Red Cross national societies and the international Red Cross and Red
Crescent movement, for which the GNSO had
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20131120-2> recommended a
90-day period of protection by way of a claim notification service utilising
the Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH).
On 16 June 2014 the NGPC
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chalaby-to-robinson-16jun14-en.pdf>
sent a letter to the GNSO Council requesting that the GNSO consider
modifying its recommendations relating to the duration and mechanism of
protection for IGO acronyms and national society names of the Red Cross.
This modification to be in accordance with and as envisaged by Section 16 of
the GNSO's
<http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-2-pdp-manual-13jun13-en.pdf> PDP
Manual.
On 24 July 2014, the Chair of the NGPC followed up with a note to the Chair
of the GNSO Council and offered to provide a written or oral briefing to
provide greater clarity on the GAC’s advice and expectations with respect
to protections of IGO-INGO Identifiers. As a result of the briefing it was
agreed to send a follow-up letter to the NGPC. Here the Council will review
the letter with the objective of providing sufficient input and/or support
such that the letter can now be sent.
4.1 ?C <http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16658.html>
Review the letter (Thomas Rickert / Mary Wong)
4.2 ?C Discussion
Item 5: UPDATE ?C A GNSO liaison to the GAC (10 mins)
The council voted to appoint Mason Cole as the GNSO Liaison to the GAC with
immediate effect such that he can be well informed and up to speed in order
to participate effectively as soon as possible and, in particular, at ICANN
51.
Here the Council will have an opportunity to hear from Mason Cole ahead of
the ICANN meeting in Los Angeles in order to be clear on the proposed
objectives and plan of action.
5.1 ?C Introduction (Mason Cole)
5.2 ?C Discussion
Item 6: UPDATE - PDP WG on IRTP Part D - Final Recommendations (10 mins)
The WG anticipates that it will be in a position to submit its Final Report
in advance of the ICANN meeting in Los Angeles. As such, James Bladel, the
Chair of the WG, has proposed that he presents the Final Report and
recommendations to the Council now so that there is ample time for review
and discussion prior to and during the LA meeting which with the objective
being that the Council is in a well-informed position to vote on the report
during the meeting in LA.
Here the Council will have an opportunity to hear from James Bladel ahead of
the ICANN meeting in Los Angeles.
6.1 ?C Presentation (James Bladel)
6.2 ?C Discussion
Item 7: UPDATE ?C Subsequent rounds of new gTLDs ?C status report (15 mins)
A status report from ICANN staff following on from the GNSO Council’s
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406> motion on New gTLD
Subsequent Rounds was requested during the ICANN 50 meeting in London.
This status update is expected to include status reporting on:
(a) the new gTLD program in general;
(b) ICANN's anticipated timeline and work plan for the review specified in
Section 9.3 of the Affirmation of Commitments;
(c) ICANN's work to date on any evaluation of the first round;
(d) the work to date on the post-launch independent review of the Trademark
Clearinghouse; (e) ICANN's current projection for a timetable for subsequent
rounds.
An interim update has previously been
<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg16606.html>
provided by Karen Lentz but a more
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/presentation-new-gtld-subsequent-22
sep14-en.pdf> detailed reportis anticipated in advance of this council
meeting. Here the Council will have an initial discussion during in order to
be best prepared for and potentially provide more detailed topics for review
/ discussion during the LA meeting.
7.1 ?C
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/presentation-new-gtld-subsequent-22
sep14-en.pdf> Update (Karen Lentz)
7.2 ?C Discussion
Item 8: UPDATE ?C A cross community working group to develop a transition
proposal for IANA stewardship on naming related functions (10 mins)
A drafting team (DT) was formed with participants from the ccNSO, GNSO, SSAC
and ALAC to develop a charter for a Cross Community Working Group to Develop
an IANA Stewardship Transition Proposal on Naming Related Functions.
Following adoption of the
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/iana-stewardship-naming-function-charter-14
aug14-en.pdf> charter at the previous meeting, this is an opportunity for
the Council to receive a brief update on the next steps.
8.1 ?C Update (Jonathan Robinson)
8.2 - Next steps
Item 9: DISCUSSION ?C The report of the ICANN Board Working Group on the
Nominating Committee (10 mins)
The Board Working Group on Nominating Committee (BWG?\NomCom) is charged
with performing the review called for in Recommendation 10 of the Nominating
Committee Review Finalization Working Group, addressing issues of the size
and composition of the Nominating Committee, as well as the related issues
of NomCom’s recruitment and selection functions.
The Board Working Group on Nominating Committee has recently published its
<https://www.icann.org/public-comments/bwg-nomcom-2014-08-21-en> report.
Here the Council will take the opportunity to consider what if any action
that should be taken on the part of the Council.
9.1 ?C Introduction
9.2 ?C Discussion
9.3 ?C Next steps
Item 10: UPDATE & DISCUSSION ?C Planning for LA (10 mins)
Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available at the ICANN
Meeting in LA will take planning and preparation work. The Council has
output from the <https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/QMQJY7Z> survey of the
ICANN 50 meeting in London.
Here the Council has the opportunity to feed into plans and provide input
based on past experience. Included in this item will be the opportunity to
shape the approach to and substance of the Council's proposed meetings with
other groups such as the ccNSO, the GAC and the ICANN board.
Please Note: The LA Meeting is an ICANN annual meeting and so will include
the GNSO Council development session on the second Friday i.e. Friday 17
October 2014. This is a day and evening session focused on the successful
and productive functioning of the Council for the period Annual Meeting 2014
to Annual Meeting 2015.
10.1 ?C Update (David Cake & Jonathan Robinson)
10.2 ?C Discussion
10.3 ?C Next steps
Item 11: Any Other Business (5 mins)
11.1 ?C Input from Jennifer Wolfe on the GNSO Review including Survey
participation.
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section
3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the
GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council
motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House.
The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO
actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described
in <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA> Annex A):
requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or
more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter
approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to
the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause,
upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of
termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one
GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain
Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a
two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus,
the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by
the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended
by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a
majority of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (
<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf>
GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4)
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN
Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the
announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's
adjournment. In exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the
vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7
calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all
Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee
votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting
by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may
become available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be
a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 18:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA (
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>
PDT) UTC-7+1DST 11:00
Iowa City, USA ( <http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/UTC%E2%88%9206:00> CDT)
UTC-5+1DST 13:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-4+1DST 14:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-2+1DST 15:00
Montevideo, Uruguay (
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>
UYST) UTC-2+1DST 15:00
Buenos Aires, Argentina (
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/art.html>
ART) UTC-3+0DST 15:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 19:00
Bonn, Germany (CET) UTC+1+0DST 20:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 20:00
Cairo, Egypt, (EET) UTC+2+0DST 21:00
Istanbul, Turkey (EEST) UTC+2+0DST 21:00
Ramat Hasharon, Israel(
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.
html> IDT) UTC+3+0DST 21:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 02:00
Perth, Australia (
<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html> WST)
UTC+8+0DST 02:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2014, 2:00 or 3:00 local time
(with exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see <http://www.timeanddate.com/>
http://www.timeanddate.com
<http://tinyurl.com/qek29ro> http://tinyurl.com/qek29ro
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|