Re: [council] IGO/RC motion
Hello all, On the procedural question, Section 16 does foresee the Council finally and ultimately taking a vote on the final form of the proposed policy modifications (if any) - that needs to be by Supermajority Vote. However, that occurs later on in the process - that is, after the reconvened WG has been consulted AND public comments received and reviewed. In terms of what the initial proposed modification looks like, while it¹s up to the Council to actually formulate such a proposal, the reconvened WG has the ability to comment in whatsoever way on that proposal, i.e. It could say ³Looks great², or ³Bad idea², or ³Well, we see what you¹re trying to do so how about doing it this way² etc. Then it¹s that WG comment back that the Council would consider in deciding finally whether to adopt its original formulation or some amended form (based on WG comment and/or public comment) or none. I hope this helps. Cheers Mary Mary Wong Senior Policy Director Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN) Telephone: +1 603 574 4892 Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx -----Original Message----- From: Volker Greimann <vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thursday, July 24, 2014 at 7:20 AM To: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>, GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: Re: [council] IGO/RC motion > >Hi Avri, > >this is my understanding as well. > >We either tell them: "Here is what we came up with, yes or no?" or we do >nothing. > >Volker > > >Am 24.07.2014 12:33, schrieb Avri Doria: >> I agree with you in principle on this. The problem is I do not believe >> that this is what the rule we are working under says. My >> interpretation of the rule and on of the clarification we got is that >> we have to. at least provisionally, approve the amendment we send them >> to reconsider. >>> BTW, I earlier, you mentioned that an NCSG position was that whatever >>>we >>> give IGOs, we should give INGOs. The ALAC was an early advocate of INGO >>> protections and I think it would likely agree with you in this case. I >>> would support incorporating that into anything we pass to the WG. >> My interpretation of the rule we are working under, does not allow the >> the reopened WG to do anything more that agree or disagree with the >> proposed amendments. I do not think the reopened group has the option >> to change the proposed amendments. >> >> A different rule might allow that, but in this case, I think the rule >> this is being presented under would not allow that. If we wanted that, >> we would need to change the amendments before sending them. >> >> avri >> > >-- >Bei weiteren Fragen stehen wir Ihnen gerne zur Verfügung. > >Mit freundlichen Grüßen, > >Volker A. Greimann >- Rechtsabteilung - > >Key-Systems GmbH >Im Oberen Werk 1 >66386 St. Ingbert >Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 >Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 >Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net >www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com > >Folgen Sie uns bei Twitter oder werden Sie unser Fan bei Facebook: >www.facebook.com/KeySystems >www.twitter.com/key_systems > >Geschäftsführer: Alexander Siffrin >Handelsregister Nr.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken >Umsatzsteuer ID.: DE211006534 > >Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP >www.keydrive.lu > >Der Inhalt dieser Nachricht ist vertraulich und nur für den angegebenen >Empfänger bestimmt. Jede Form der Kenntnisgabe, Veröffentlichung oder >Weitergabe an Dritte durch den Empfänger ist unzulässig. Sollte diese >Nachricht nicht für Sie bestimmt sein, so bitten wir Sie, sich mit uns >per E-Mail oder telefonisch in Verbindung zu setzen. > >-------------------------------------------- > >Should you have any further questions, please do not hesitate to contact >us. > >Best regards, > >Volker A. Greimann >- legal department - > >Key-Systems GmbH >Im Oberen Werk 1 >66386 St. Ingbert >Tel.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 901 >Fax.: +49 (0) 6894 - 9396 851 >Email: vgreimann@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > >Web: www.key-systems.net / www.RRPproxy.net >www.domaindiscount24.com / www.BrandShelter.com > >Follow us on Twitter or join our fan community on Facebook and stay >updated: >www.facebook.com/KeySystems >www.twitter.com/key_systems > >CEO: Alexander Siffrin >Registration No.: HR B 18835 - Saarbruecken >V.A.T. ID.: DE211006534 > >Member of the KEYDRIVE GROUP >www.keydrive.lu > >This e-mail and its attachments is intended only for the person to whom >it is addressed. Furthermore it is not permitted to publish any content >of this email. You must not use, disclose, copy, print or rely on this >e-mail. If an addressing or transmission error has misdirected this >e-mail, kindly notify the author by replying to this e-mail or contacting >us by telephone. > > > Attachment:
smime.p7s
|