RE: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014

["Winterfeldt, Brian J." <brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Dear James:

I do not think it impacts the Charter, I just wanted to add some clarity to 
guide our Council discussions, and perhaps PDP WG deliberations.

Thank you,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244

575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585
p / (212) 940.6762  f / (212) 894.5585
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> / 
www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>

________________________________
From: James M. Bladel
Sent: Wednesday, June 25, 2014 6:16:39 AM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)
To: Winterfeldt, Brian J.
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014
Thanks, Brian.  One thing I love about my work is that I'm always learning 
something new.

My only question involves whether or not this, in your opinion, impacts the 
charter?  Did we goof on this?

Thank you--

J.
__________________________
James Bladel
GoDaddy
jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>



On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:58, "Winterfeldt, Brian J." 
<brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote:

Dear all:



I wanted to clarify that the mechanisms we are discussing in connection with 
the motion and PDP WG, namely the UDRP, the URS, and any newly developed 
mechanism for IGOs, are all administrative alternative dispute resolution 
mechanisms, rather than arbitration mechanisms.  There is an important legal 
distinction between the two that we should recognize and adopt in our 
discussions.



The UDRP and URS are contractual administrative mechanisms for resolving 
disputes outside of national courts.  Conversely, arbitration awards are inter 
alia enforceable in national courts.  See Convention on the Recognition and 
Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, New York (June 10, 1958).



I do not believe this subtle point necessitates any changes to the draft 
Charter.  I just wanted to add some clarity to guide our Council discussions, 
and perhaps PDP WG deliberations.


Thank you,

Brian

Brian J. Winterfeldt
Head of Internet Practice
Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP
2900 K Street NW, North Tower - Suite 200 / Washington, DC 20007-5118
p / (202) 625-3562 f / (202) 339-8244

575 Madison Avenue / New York, NY 10022-2585
p / (212) 940.6762  f / (212) 894.5585
brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:brian.winterfeldt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> / 
www.kattenlaw.com<http://www.kattenlaw.com/>

-----Original Message-----
From: Winterfeldt, Brian J.
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 6:47 PM
To: Marano, Phillip V.
Subject: FW: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014









________________________________________

From: owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn<mailto:owner-council@gnso.icann.orgOn> 
Behalf OfAvri Doria

Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 1:44:44 PM (UTC-05:00) Eastern Time (US & Canada)

To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject: [council] Fwd: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014



A revised revision of the charter that corrects one mistake.



avri





-------- Original Message --------

Subject:        FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014

Date:   Tue, 24 Jun 2014 08:58:43 -0700

From:   Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>

To:     Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>, Maria Farrell 
<maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>>







Hello ladies - are you planning to send this to the Council for discussion this 
evening? Thanks!







From: Lori Schulman <lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx 
<mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx%20%3cmailto:lori.schulman@xxxxxxxx>>>

Date: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 at 2:31 PM

To: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx 
<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx%20%3cmailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>>>

Subject: FW: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014



    FYI - just sent











    *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel

    1703 North Beauregard Street



    Alexandria, VA  22311-1714



    P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>

    Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0











    *From:*Lori Schulman

    *Sent:* Tuesday, June 24, 2014 9:21 AM

    *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; 'Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx> 
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)'

    *Cc:* 'Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>

    <mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>)'; 'Rafik Dammak

    (rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)'

    *Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014

    *Importance:* High







    Dear All,







    Attached is the amendment with the name of the UN list corrected.  I

    didn't catch that last night.   I went to the UN link that Avri

    provided and literally copied the title.  There is a redline with

    the corrected version and then a "clean" redline.  This should go to

    the GNSO Council.  This was clearly a drafting error.







    Lori







    *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel

    1703 North Beauregard Street



    Alexandria, VA  22311-1714



    P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>

    Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0











    *From:*Lori Schulman

    *Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 4:41 PM

    *To:* 'Kathy Kleiman'; Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx> 
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)

    *Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>

    <mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>); Rafik Dammak

    (rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)

    *Subject:* RE: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit







    I like these changes.  Thanks for expanding.  I especially like the

    "research who already owns marks."  Good Luck at the GNSO.











    *Lori S. Schulman** General Counsel

    1703 North Beauregard Street



    Alexandria, VA  22311-1714



    P 703-575-5678 * Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:Lori.Schulman@xxxxxxxx>

    Description: cid:image001.png@01CC81E2.512C46F0











    *From:*Kathy Kleiman [mailto:kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

    <mailto:[mailto:kathy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]>

    *Sent:* Monday, June 23, 2014 3:45 PM

    *To:* Lori Schulman; Avri Doria (avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx> 
<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>)

    *Cc:* Rudi Vansnick (rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx<mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>

    <mailto:rudi.vansnick@xxxxxxx>); Rafik Dammak

    (rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx> 
<mailto:rafik.dammak@xxxxxxxxx>)

    *Subject:* Re: Draft CRP WG Charter - 25 May 2014 (3) with LS Edit







    Hi All,

    Tx so much to Lori for starting everything. I really appreciate it!

    All, here is an edited version based on considerations of scope and

    limits that we discussed in framing both the UDRP and URS. What do

    you think?



    Best,

    Kathy

    p.s. Lori, again, tx you!  What do you think of the edits?

    Hopefully, I extended and continued your thoughts...



    :



        Dear Avri and Kathy,







        Here is my attempt at a short, hopefully not too debatable,

        amendment to the charter.  My edits and comments are in redline

        form.  I tried to keep it very simple given the issue of time.

        I put 2 new bullet points before the final bullet point under

        "The WG should also include the following additional topics in

        its deliberations:"







        I specifically referenced the Nice Classification system as a

        method of mission differentiation as an optional clause.  My

        thoughts are to leave it out but I wanted to surface the option

        to the group instead of just dismissing it out of hand.  Nice

        has a lot of problems but it is the document that drives

        international classification and may be worth referencing.  I

        will leave that up to you.



        / /



        I believe that this working group should move forward and

        incorporate the principles that we discussed yesterday.  Perhaps

        these few lines will do the trick?







       Please let me know if I can help further.











        *Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every

        classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence,

        June 27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions

        on assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and

        instructional practices. Featured presenters include Jay

        McTighe, Baruti Kafele, Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson.

        Register NOW at **www.ascd.org/cte<http://www.ascd.org/cte>. 
<http://www.ascd.org/cte>*







        This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of







        the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information 
that is







        confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended 
recipient or







        have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,



        distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments.

Please notify the



        sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message 
and any







        attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus 
free.







    ------------------------------------------------------------------------



    <http://www.avast.com/>







    This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus

    <http://www.avast.com/> protection is active.















    *Explore ways to make excellent teaching the reality in every

    classroom. Attend the ASCD Conference on Teaching Excellence, June

    27-29, in Dallas, Tex. Choose from more than 150 sessions on

    assessment, college and career readiness, STEM, and instructional

    practices. Featured presenters include Jay McTighe, Baruti Kafele,

    Richard Curwin and Carol Ann Tomlinson. Register NOW at

    **www.ascd.org/cte<http://www.ascd.org/cte>. <http://www.ascd.org/cte>*****



    This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of



    the person(s) to whom it has been sent, and may contain information that is



    confidential or legally protected. If you are not the intended recipient or



    have received this message in error, you are not authorized to copy,

    distribute, or otherwise use this message or its attachments. Please notify 
the

    sender immediately by return e-mail and permanently delete this message and 
any



    attachments. ASCD makes no guarantee that this e-mail is error or virus 
free.







===========================================================

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE:

This electronic mail message and any attached files contain information 
intended for the exclusive

use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and may contain 
information that is

proprietary, privileged, confidential and/or exempt from disclosure under 
applicable law.  If you

are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any viewing, 
copying, disclosure or

distribution of this information may be subject to legal restriction or 
sanction.  Please notify

the sender, by electronic mail or telephone, of any unintended recipients and 
delete the original

message without making any copies.

===========================================================

NOTIFICATION:  Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP is an Illinois limited liability 
partnership that has

elected to be governed by the Illinois Uniform Partnership Act (1997).

===========================================================