Re: [council] GNSO/GAC Liaison
John, please note that the proposed skills and experience outlined in the document are as follows: Skills and Experience * Significant experience in and knowledge of the GNSO policy development process as well as of recent and current policy work under discussion and / or review in the GNSO * Availability to travel to and participate in GAC meetings during the course of ICANN meetings and also, where applicable, intercessional meetings (via teleconference) * An outgoing or recently departed GNSO Councilor is likely to be well-qualified for the position but this is not a necessary criterion for the Liaison. Best regards, Marika From: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wednesday 25 June 2014 11:56 To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [council] GNSO/GAC Liaison Jonathan, Is it certain the candidate be a recent (within a year?) GNSO councillor or might a right candidate be someone who may have never sat on the Council? Berard Sent from my iPhone On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:41 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > All, > > Please recall that we would like to commence the recruitment and selection of > a GNSO Liaison to the GAC as soon as possible. > This item will be discussed under Item 10 in the GNSO Council meeting today. > > Please note that the GAC has already approved this at our meeting with them on > Sunday. > > I have attached the slides from the presentation to the GAC for your > information. > I have also attached the draft specification. > > Thanks, > > > Jonathan > <GAC-GNSO CG London Slides - 19 June 2014.pdf> > <GNSO Liaison to the GAC-DRAFT 06 June 2014.pdf> Attachment:
smime.p7s
|