ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter

  • To: John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter
  • From: David Cake <dave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:07:00 +0100
  • Cc: "<jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • In-reply-to: <EE0FA665-0B79-4927-80D8-7405A406ED45@crediblecontext.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CFD04AE4.A42F%mary.wong@icann.org> <018701cf905b$d4263090$7c7291b0$@afilias.info> <EE0FA665-0B79-4927-80D8-7405A406ED45@crediblecontext.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Yes, while it is helpful to note initiating constituency/stakeholder 
group/councillor in tracking the source of changes, and amendments should be 
recorded as having been moved if necessary, I don't believe this information 
should make its way into the text of motions.

Regards
David
On 25 Jun 2014, at 11:00 am, John Berard <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or 
stakeholder group?

Berard

Sent from my iPhone

On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 
wrote:

All,

To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the 
NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the 
motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below 
(additions in bold).

Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance.

Thanks,

Jonathan

--
WHEREAS:
1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy 
development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute 
Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as 
to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International 
Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights 
protection mechanisms;
2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as 
Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf) 
which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments 
proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf);
RESOLVED:
1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014 
proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO 
Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG);
2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the 
PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and
3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is 
confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve 
as the interim chair.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>