<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter
- To: "'John Berard'" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter
- From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2014 11:04:29 +0100
- Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- In-reply-to: <EE0FA665-0B79-4927-80D8-7405A406ED45@crediblecontext.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Organization: Afilias
- References: <CFD04AE4.A42F%mary.wong@icann.org> <018701cf905b$d4263090$7c7291b0$@afilias.info> <EE0FA665-0B79-4927-80D8-7405A406ED45@crediblecontext.com>
- Reply-to: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: AQGUIDb7G0sleytucWiAgzIfkmI66AKKdIWVAeiyBtqb1N/ooA==
I am not sure I understand?
From: John Berard [mailto:john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 25 June 2014 11:01
To: <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Updated motion for IGO Curative Rights charter
Is it necessary to parse Council actions by initiating constituency or
stakeholder group?
Berard
Sent from my iPhone
On Jun 25, 2014, at 10:57 AM, "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
All,
To take into account the new edits/additions that have been proposed by the
NCSG, I suggest (with acknowledged assistance from Policy Staff) that the
motion for the Curative Rights Protection PDP charter be augmented as below
(additions in bold).
Thomas, as the second, please confirm acceptance.
Thanks,
Jonathan
--
WHEREAS:
1. The GNSO Council has resolved (see
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#201406) to undertake a GNSO policy
development process (PDP) to explore possible amendments to the Uniform Dispute
Resolution Policy (UDRP) and the Uniform Rapid Suspension procedure (URS) so as
to enable International Governmental Organizations (IGOs) and International
Non-Governmental Organizations (INGOs) to access and use curative rights
protection mechanisms;
2. The GNSO Council has reviewed the draft Working Group Charter appended as
Annex 3 to the Final Issue Report (see
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-25may14-en.pdf)
which was delivered to the GNSO Council on 25 May 2014, and the amendments
proposed thereto on 24 June 2014 by the Non-Commercial Stakeholder Group (see
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf>
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/igo-ingo-crp-access-charter-24jun14-en.pdf);
RESOLVED:
1. The GNSO Council approves the Charter as amended by the 24 June 2014
proposals and appoints ___________ as the GNSO Council liaison to the IGO-INGO
Curative Rights Protection PDP Working Group (WG);
2. The GNSO Council directs ICANN staff to issue a call for volunteers for the
PDP WG no later than seven days after the approval of this motion; and
3. Until such time as the WG selects a chair for the WG and that chair is
confirmed by the GNSO Council, the GNSO Council liaison to the WG shall serve
as the interim chair.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|