RE: Re: [council] FW: Letter from Cherine Chalaby

[john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

All,
 
Based on the presentation we got from Chris Disspain in Singapore, the Board is 
trying to figure out how to abide by the contradictory Council policy (passed 
unanimously) and GAC advice (s growing presence in the life of ICANN) on the 
matter.  I feel their pain, but worry/assume in the current Internet 
governance-fueled environment, if a collaborative solution is not found, the 
GAC will prevail.
 
Not compromise or capitulation, but collaboration. 
 
Cheers,
 
Berard
 
--------- Original Message --------- Subject: Re: [council] FW: Letter from 
Cherine Chalaby
From: "Maria Farrell" <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: 6/17/14 9:08 am
To: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "Marika Konings" <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx>, "James M. Bladel" 
<jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

 Thanks so much, Jonathan. 


 On 17 June 2014 16:51, Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
    Thanks James & Maria,
  
 Noted.  We have a lengthy slot on Saturday to discuss substantial issues as 
well as our session with the Board.
  
 I expect that this issue can be well aired then and it is also likely to be on 
our agenda for the public GNSO Council meeting on Wednesday.
  
 Jonathan
  
 From: Maria Farrell [mailto:maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx] 
 Sent: 17 June 2014 15:19
To: Marika Konings
Cc: James M. Bladel; jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  
Subject: Re: [council] FW: Letter from Cherine Chalaby

 
   
   This indeed very concerning - a further extension of supra-legal 'rights' 
using the TMCH, itself a deeply problematic mechanism created in inequitable 
circumstances.
 
I also hope that sufficient time will be allocated at our meeting to discuss 
this issue.
 
Maria
 

  On 17 June 2014 08:12, Marika Konings <marika.konings@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
   Hi James,
 
 
 
We'll get the letter posted on the GNSO correspondence page. Please note that 
in the meantime it is also available from the Council mailing list archives 
(http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/pdfJhQNX8whn3.pdf). 
 
 
 
Best regards,
 
 
 
Marika
 
 
 
From: "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Tuesday 17 June 2014 08:47
To: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Subject: Re: [council] FW: Letter from Cherine Chalaby
 
 
 
Jonathan and fellow Councilors:
 
 
 
This is a concerning development, and I hope we will have ample space on our 
agenda to discuss in London.  Question:  Will this letter be published on the 
GNSO/ICANN correspondence page in advance of the weekend sessions?
 
 
 
Thanks-
 
 
 
J.
 
 
 
 
 
From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Organization: Afilias
Reply-To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
 Date: Monday, June 16, 2014 at 23:11 
To: GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [council] FW: Letter from Cherine Chalaby
 
 
 
All,
  
 FYI and for further discussion / follow-up.
  
 Jonathan
  
   From: Megan Bishop [mailto:megan.bishop@xxxxxxxxx] 
 Sent: 16 June 2014 21:09
To: jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Letter from Cherine Chalaby
 

 
  Dear Jonathan,
 
 
 
Attached please find a letter from Cherine Chalaby, providing an update on the 
ongoing work by the NGPC in response to the GNSO policy recommendations 
regarding Protection of IGO-INGO identifiers.
 
 
 
Regards,
 
Megan 
 
 
 
Megan Bishop
 
Board Support Coordinator
 
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN)
 
 
 
12025 Waterfront Dr., Suite 300
 
Los Angeles, CA 90094
 
Mobile: +1-310-795-1894
 
Direct: +1-310-301-5808
 
 
 
One World. One Internet.