<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] A way forward on the Specification 13 question
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: [council] A way forward on the Specification 13 question
- From: Bret Fausett <bret@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 7 May 2014 08:21:05 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CF856A90.58CF0%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <CF856A90.58CF0%jbladel@godaddy.com>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I see that the motion does not yet have a second, so I would like to second the
motion for tomorrow’s meeting.
--
Bret Fausett, Esq. • General Counsel, Uniregistry, Inc.
12025 Waterfront Drive, Suite 200 • Playa Vista, CA 90094-2536
310-496-5755 (T) • 310-985-1351 (M) • bret@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
— — — — —
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|