ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]

<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Draft Motion for Approval of Revised GNSO Operating Procedures
  • From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
  • Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2014 10:33:32 -0400
  • In-reply-to: <CAC7qwdCbacy_0DnNS98bYp=qG18sLJ8rhd-VEAkJv_6qgYWO7A@mail.gmail.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <CF44C4D7.1C42B%julie.hedlund@icann.org> <5322FED8.4080701@acm.org> <CAC7qwdCbacy_0DnNS98bYp=qG18sLJ8rhd-VEAkJv_6qgYWO7A@mail.gmail.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.3; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.3.0

It does need a second.

avri


On 14-Mar-14 09:55, Maria Farrell wrote:

Thanks, Avri.

Do you need a second for this motion?

Maria


On 14 March 2014 13:06, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx <mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
wrote:



    Attached is a motion and a red line Revision of the GNSO Operating
    principles addressing the following issues:

     > a.    the current GNSO Operating
     > Procedures do not contain a specific provision on the possibility of
     > resubmitting a motion for voting by the GNSO Council; and

        b.      the current GNSO Working Group Guidelines, which form
        Annex I of
        the GNSO Operating Procedures, do not contain a mechanism for
        Working
        Groups (WGs) to self-assess their work.


    These issues were referred to the SCI by the GNSO Council.

    These recommendations are made by the SCI after discussions that led
    to full consensus in the Committee.

    Thanks

    Avri Doria
    Acting as GNSO Council liaison to SCI
<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>