RE: [council] DRAFT/early thoughts on what a CEO performance review motion

["Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

All,

 

Notwithstanding John's idea  to provoke us a little on this, I think there
is some wise counsel from Mikey & Amr and probably reason to pause.

Consider any proposed action or activity in the context of:

 

1.       The role / remit of the Council

2.       The potnetial impact on reputation / perception of the Council and
/ or ICANN

 

Also, there's no reason, given that he has agreed to meet with us, that we
cannot talk directly with Fadi about concerns or issues.

I haven't spoken with him 1:1 for a while but we are (almost) certain to
have the opportunity in Singapore.

 

So, in addition to 1 & 2 above, time or timing. 

 

Jonathan

 

From: Amr Elsadr [mailto:aelsadr@xxxxxxxxxxx] 
Sent: 27 February 2014 20:35
To: Mike O'Connor
Cc: John Berard; Klaus Stoll; John Berard; Council
Subject: Re: [council] DRAFT/early thoughts on what a CEO performance review
motion

 

Hi,

 

Totally agree, Mikey. I would, however, be more inclined to lend my support
to this if it weren't drafted as a motion, but rather something more in the
lines of an informal recommendation from us to the SO/AC leadership adding
to it the suggestion of chartering a CCWG, and leave it for them to decide
if and how they would like to pursue it.

 

I would also leave the part in the last paragraph regarding championing
changes to the policy development process out, because, I don't see that he
has actually done that in this instance. Of course, if you all would like to
add the new gTLD strawman topic of early last year, and specifically the
inclusion of the 50 confusingly similar strings to the TM Clearinghouse
records., well., that's one time I feel the PDP was truly bypassed.

 

On another less serious note.,

 

  On 2/27/2014 7:43 PM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

 

[SNIP]





Whereas, Fadi Chehade was announced as the new CEO and President of ICANN at
the organization's meeting in Prague in June 2012, and

Whereas, in his first presentation to the ICANN community in Prague in June
2012, he noted that "I am driven by building consensus.  It is the reason I
am here today. There is no other reason. I love doing this. Bringing
communities that on the face of it could never be brought together to agree
on common things is exactly what I strive to do,"

 

Hasn't Fadi, through his actions, actually managed to bring this community
together and help us reach consensus., at least on this topic?!?! :)

 

Thanks.

 

Amr

 

On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:53 PM, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:





hi all,

 

sometimes i come up with an idea late at night that sounds killer clever -
and then the next morning i look at it in the light of day and realize that
if i really want to pull this idea off, it's going to take a lot more
thinking and refinement before it's ready.

 

immediate reactions:

 

- i'm uncomfortable with the "constituency and stakeholder leadership"
phrase - if it's truly going to be reflective of the bottom-up process, the
participation ought to be open, just like a working group is open 

 

- if it's going to be run like a working group, it ought to be chartered
like a working group - problem statement, scope, approach, deliverables, all
that jazz

 

- if it's really going to be reflective of the whole community it ought to
be a cross-community working group and not contained by the edges of the
GNSO

 

as i follow my nose down that chain of logic i find myself stepping back a
bit.  are we really ready to take this on?  are we really the right group?
is this really the best way to express our concerns?

 

is this the battle that's most important to fight right now?  

 

mikey

 

 

On Feb 27, 2014, at 1:20 PM, John Berard <johnberard@xxxxxxx> wrote:





Klaus,

As I said, this is new ground and deserves the group's thinking.  Consider
my efforts merely the provocation.

Berard 

 

-----Original Message-----
From: Klaus Stoll <kdrstoll@xxxxxxxxx>
To: john <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>; council <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Thu, Feb 27, 2014 11:10 am
Subject: Re: [council] DRAFT/early thoughts on what a CEO performance review
motion

Dear Berard, Dear All

Whereas, I am not necessarily opposed to the motion, I wonder if the GNSO is
the right place to move and develop it. As a newcomer to the GNSO Council, I
want to be clear if this is inside the pdp remit of the council.

Please advice!

Yours, Klaus

PS: Whereas I move, the motion should be filed under "clever ICANN CEO's
assassination attempts". :-) 

  On 2/27/2014 7:43 PM, john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

All,

Does this get at the intent?  Suggestions are more than welcome as I think
we are breaking new ground here.  I apologize if the format is not perfect,
but if we crowdsource it, I think we can button it up.

Cheers,

Berard

Whereas, Fadi Chehade was announced as the new CEO and President of ICANN at
the organization's meeting in Prague in June 2012, and

Whereas, in his first presentation to the ICANN community in Prague in June
2012, he noted that "I am driven by building consensus.  It is the reason I
am here today. There is no other reason. I love doing this. Bringing
communities that on the face of it could never be brought together to agree
on common things is exactly what I strive to do," and

Whereas, as reported at the time he joined ICANN, "In selecting Chehade,
ICANN went with someone who isn't well known and isn't well versed in the
organization's core tasks - keeping the Internet address system running
smoothly," and

Whereas, in the two years of his term, the landscape of the Internet and
role played by ICANN has changed in ways equal only to the origin of the
organization, including significant budget and staff increases, and

Whereas, in response to the expanded attention to the domain name system and
ICANN's role in managing it, Chehade has championed changes in the policy
development process,

Therefore, beginning on March 26, 2014 with the passage of this motion, and
continuing through the next ICANN public meeting in London in June 2014, the
community, under the leadership of a review committee comprised of the
GNSO's constituency and stakeholder leadership, shall have the opportunity
to offer comment on the performance of the CEO.

 

 

 


PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com
<http://www.haven2.com/> , HANDLE: OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook,
LinkedIn, etc.)