Re: [council] Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2) Final Report & Recommendations
+1 Thomas Am 21.02.2014 um 15:48 schrieb "James M. Bladel" <jbladel@xxxxxxxxxxx>: > I also support Mikey’s edits, but to Klaus’ point, I’m wondering if we can > insert something emphasizing that new participants be “volunteers”? We do > not want to encourage the trend of hiring outside experts, proliferating > Staff, and hand-picked participants chosen by an opaque “selection committee.” > > J. > > > From: Klaus Stoll <kdrstoll@xxxxxxxxx> > Date: Friday, February 21, 2014 at 8:02 > To: "Reed, Daniel A" <dan-reed@xxxxxxxxx>, Mike O'Connor <mike@xxxxxxxxxx>, > GNSO Council List <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: Re: [council] Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team > (ATRT 2) Final Report & Recommendations > > Fine with me as long as we don't start breading more "experts". > > Klaus > > On 2/21/2014 2:46 PM, Reed, Daniel A wrote: >> I think this is fine. >> >> Dan >> >> From:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On >> Behalf Of Mike O'Connor >> Sent: Friday, February 21, 2014 7:04 AM >> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Subject: Re: [council] Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team >> (ATRT 2) Final Report & Recommendations >> >> hi all, >> >> i agree Maria. i had a go at adding another paragraph to our response to >> Rec #10.3 and have attached the revised draft. but to save you time, here’s >> the language i inserted >> >> "The ATRT2 report documents how a very small group of dedicated volunteers >> carry an extraordinary proportion of the working-group load and correctly >> identifies this as a major concern. We note that simply increasing the pool >> of people aware of and in some way engaged with ICANN should not be viewed >> as the goal. Ultimately what is needed is a larger and more diverse group >> of active and effective participants in PDP working groups. Although >> outreach is an important part of the effort and crucial for bringing >> newcomers to ICANN, the path to this goal should not end at simply >> recruiting a large diverse group of people. Rather, there needs to be a >> clear and well-supported progression for newcomers to gain the skills, >> knowledge and experience needed to broaden the ranks of active PDP >> participants and leaders.” >> >> happy to consider revisions. >> >> mikey >> >> On Feb 21, 2014, at 3:56 AM, Maria Farrell <maria.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> >> Hi Jonathan, >> >> I'm happy to support this, and thank you for drafting it. There's one small >> typo, track changes version attached. It's in para 1, page 3. >> >> I'd have liked if we tackled head-on the issue of the narrowness of some PDP >> WGs' participation, which the ATRT2 report provided some pretty convincing >> numbers on. But as I haven't gone to the trouble of actually drafting >> anything on it, I can't complain. >> >> All the best, Maria >> >> >> On 21 February 2014 09:15, Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> As a member of the ATRT2, I do not believe it my job to comment on our >> report. >> >> I think the GNSO response is fine as far as it goes and I am pleased that at >> least something is being submitted - though I must admit I am less than >> enthused about responses that essentially say "we are already doing that". >> >> I might have wished for it to be more supportive of other aspects of the >> report, but the response is what it is. >> >> avri >> >> >> On 21-Feb-14 09:43, Jonathan Robinson wrote: >> *_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 8 HOURS_* >> >> *From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx] >> *Sent:* 20 February 2014 09:38 >> *To:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> *Subject:* RE: Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT >> >> 2) Final Report & Recommendations >> >> All, >> >> The deadline for submission of public comment on the ends approximately >> 36 hours from now. >> >> I am OK to submit a letter in substantially the same for as that >> distributed to you on 14 Feb (see below) and re-attached to this letter. >> >> BUT >> >> I need your support to do so. Accordingly, even if you simply provide >> support without any comment on the content, that will be helpful. >> >> *_PLEASE RESPOND WITHIN 24 HOURS_* >> >> Thank-you. >> >> Jonathan >> >> *From:*Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx] >> *Sent:* 14 February 2014 17:21 >> *To:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >> *Subject:* Second Accountability and Transparency Review Team (ATRT 2) >> Final Report & Recommendations >> *Importance:* High >> >> >> All, >> >> If you are not already, please be aware of the following: >> >> http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/atrt2-recommendations-09jan14-en.htm >> >> The opportunity to provide comments _ends one week from today 23h59 UTC >> on 21 Feb 2014_. >> >> >> The ATRT2 interacted with many in the community during the course of its >> work, including directly with the GNSO Council which was certainly >> appreciated. We now have an opportunity to comment on the final report. >> >> If we do intend to comment, my opinion is that we should at least submit >> an indication of intent, if not the primary comment, in the initial >> comment period and not wait for the reply period. >> >> Given the tight time frame, I have taken the unusual step of drafting a >> council response for your consideration. The ATRT2 deals with some >> critical areas of GNSO work and function and so it seems to me that we >> should respond to the call for comments, specifically in so far as the >> report deals with GNSO Policy and directly related areas. >> >> I am aware that some of you were on the ATRT2 and others actively worked >> on Council interaction with the ATRT2. Therefore, you may well have >> strong views on the subject matter. >> >> I look forward to your input and any suggestions. >> >> Thanks, >> >> Jonathan >> >> >> <ATRT2 - Draft Council Input (14 February 2014).doc> >> >> >> PHONE: 651-647-6109, FAX: 866-280-2356, WEB: www.haven2.com, HANDLE: >> OConnorStP (ID for Twitter, Facebook, LinkedIn, etc.) >> > Attachment:
signature.asc
|