TR: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Councillors,

Please find the updated link of the IGO-INGO Report to the Board below
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/council-board-igo-ingo-21jan14-en.pdf

This link has been added to both the agenda published online and the Wiki 
agenda under Item 3 Consent Agenda.
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+23+January+2014


http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-23jan14-en.htm

Thank you.
Kind regards,

Glen


De : owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la 
part de Mary Wong
Envoyé : mercredi 22 janvier 2014 23:14
À : council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : Re: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

Thank you, Avri. Council members - please note that for the Thursday meeting 
staff will proceed to replace the document sent to you on 13 January (and till 
now linked to at 
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/council-board-igo-ingo-13jan14-en.pdf) with the 
21 January version sent around by Berry yesterday. As Berry has noted in his 
email, the only change is the addition of the table suggested by Avri, which is 
a list and summary of all the Minority Positions submitted and a link to them. 
As such, please refer to the later (21 January) version rather than the one 
dated 13 January for your review and discussion.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>

* One World. One Internet. *

From: avri <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:46 PM
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: RE: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

Hi

Thank you. The modified report satisfies my concern.

Assuming that the modified report is the one being consented to, I withdraw my 
request regarding removal of the report from the consent agenda.

Thanks again,


avri

Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device


-------- Original message --------
From: Berry Cobb
Date:01/21/2014 21:06 (GMT-05:00)
To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: RE: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

Council Members,

Please find attached an updated version of the IGO-INGO Report to the Board
that now includes Avri's suggestion of a table listing the submitted
minority positions.  The table was added to page 8 after the recommendations
and implementation considerations.

Thank you.  B

Berry A. Cobb
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
720.839.5735
mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
@berrycobb


-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> 
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Mary Wong
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 14:18
To: Avri Doria; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

Since Avri's suggestion does not alter the content or nature of the Board
report, staff can prepare the table as suggested and append it to the
report. We should be able to send the Council a copy of the proposed
appendix later today so that the report being considered as part of the
consent agenda for Thursday will include it.

I hope this helps.

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx<mailto:mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>

* One World. One Internet. *




-----Original Message-----
From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx<mailto:avri@xxxxxxx>>
Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:02 PM
To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>" 
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>>
Subject: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

>
>Hi,
>
>First, apologies for only reading this report now in preparation for the
>meeting and not when it first came out.
>
>In reading the report I am troubled by the lack of any real mention of
>the Minority Statements.  While it is mentioned that there were minority
>statements, there is little to no mention of the subject of those
>minority statements.
>
>While it is true that the fully diligent Board member may go looking for
>these minority statements based on the cross reference, for the most
>part, I believe that fact will be missed by several at least.
>
>I think that at least one sentence abstract on the subject manner of
>each of these minority statements should be included in this report,
>yest another table. I believe this should be a standard practice for all
>Board reports given the important part minority statements play in ICANN
>policy processes.
>
>I have just begun to discuss this issue with my fellow council members
>from the NCSG so at this point am just speaking on my own behalf of my
>discomfort with this report, in its current state, being on the consent
>agenda.  I did not wish to wait until they considered this however,
>because of the tardiness with which I am making the request that this be
>removed from the consent agenda until such time as the report is
>modified or we have at least discussed the issue.
>
>thanks and renewed apologies
>
>avri
>
>
>Thanks
>
>avri