ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

  • To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board
  • From: Mary Wong <mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2014 14:13:42 -0800
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <o7x7yc4p95jq2kmjy06t9el6.1390358767818@email.android.com>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • References: <o7x7yc4p95jq2kmjy06t9el6.1390358767818@email.android.com>
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac8XvzWcnw0lORtaTTqDknVkBAg1DA==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.9.131030

Thank you, Avri. Council members ­ please note that for the Thursday meeting
staff will proceed to replace the document sent to you on 13 January (and
till now linked to at
http://gnso.icann.org/en/drafts/council-board-igo-ingo-13jan14-en.pdf) with
the 21 January version sent around by Berry yesterday. As Berry has noted in
his email, the only change is the addition of the table suggested by Avri,
which is a list and summary of all the Minority Positions submitted and a
link to them. As such, please refer to the later (21 January) version rather
than the one dated 13 January for your review and discussion.

Cheers
Mary

Mary Wong
Senior Policy Director
Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx

* One World. One Internet. *

From:  avri <avri@xxxxxxx>
Date:  Tuesday, January 21, 2014 9:46 PM
To:  "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  RE: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board

> Hi 
> 
> Thank you. The modified report satisfies my concern.
> 
> Assuming that the modified report is the one being consented to, I withdraw my
> request regarding removal of the report from the consent agenda.
> 
> Thanks again,
> 
> 
> avri
> 
> Sent from a T-Mobile 4G LTE Device
> 
> 
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Berry Cobb 
> Date:01/21/2014  21:06  (GMT-05:00)
> To: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board
> 
> Council Members,
> 
> Please find attached an updated version of the IGO-INGO Report to the Board
> that now includes Avri's suggestion of a table listing the submitted
> minority positions.  The table was added to page 8 after the recommendations
> and implementation considerations.
> 
> Thank you.  B
> 
> Berry A. Cobb
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers
> 720.839.5735
> mail@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> @berrycobb
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Mary Wong
> Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 14:18
> To: Avri Doria; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board
> 
> Since Avri's suggestion does not alter the content or nature of the Board
> report, staff can prepare the table as suggested and append it to the
> report. We should be able to send the Council a copy of the proposed
> appendix later today so that the report being considered as part of the
> consent agenda for Thursday will include it.
> 
> I hope this helps.
> 
> Mary Wong
> Senior Policy Director
> Internet Corporation for Assigned Names & Numbers (ICANN)
> Telephone: +1 603 574 4892
> Email: mary.wong@xxxxxxxxx
> 
> * One World. One Internet. *
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Avri Doria <avri@xxxxxxx>
> Date: Tuesday, January 21, 2014 4:02 PM
> To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Subject: [council] Consent agenda issue :IGO-INGO Report to board
> 
>> >
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >First, apologies for only reading this report now in preparation for the
>> >meeting and not when it first came out.
>> >
>> >In reading the report I am troubled by the lack of any real mention of
>> >the Minority Statements.  While it is mentioned that there were minority
>> >statements, there is little to no mention of the subject of those
>> >minority statements.
>> >
>> >While it is true that the fully diligent Board member may go looking for
>> >these minority statements based on the cross reference, for the most
>> >part, I believe that fact will be missed by several at least.
>> >
>> >I think that at least one sentence abstract on the subject manner of
>> >each of these minority statements should be included in this report,
>> >yest another table. I believe this should be a standard practice for all
>> >Board reports given the important part minority statements play in ICANN
>> >policy processes.
>> >
>> >I have just begun to discuss this issue with my fellow council members
>> >from the NCSG so at this point am just speaking on my own behalf of my
>> >discomfort with this report, in its current state, being on the consent
>> >agenda.  I did not wish to wait until they considered this however,
>> >because of the tardiness with which I am making the request that this be
>> >removed from the consent agenda until such time as the report is
>> >modified or we have at least discussed the issue.
>> >
>> >thanks and renewed apologies
>> >
>> >avri
>> >
>> >
>> >Thanks
>> >
>> >avri


Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>