ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

Re: [council] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public Meeting in Durban 17 July 2013.

  • To: "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council List'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: Re: [council] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public Meeting in Durban 17 July 2013.
  • From: Lars Hoffmann <lars.hoffmann@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 03:21:35 -0700
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • In-reply-to: <010701ce82d5$91756d40$b46047c0$@afilias.info>
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: Ac6C13wOOg4FOR7hQymQjrmGiO8CWw==
  • Thread-topic: [council] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public Meeting in Durban 17 July 2013.
  • User-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.3.6.130613

Glen, Jonathan
As per your email below - please find attached the amended agenda as well as
the amended powerpoint.
I have also amended the agenda on the wiki -
(https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+17+July+2013
)

JONATHAN: which headline are you referring to? Both on the wiki and on the
word file all headlines had been bolded already (to the best of my
knowledge).

Thanks all,
Lars



 ­ 




From:  Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Organization:  Afilias
Reply-To:  "jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date:  Wednesday, July 17, 2013 12:08 PM
To:  Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>, 'GNSO Council List'
<council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:  RE: [council] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public
Meeting in Durban 17 July 2013.

Glen,
 
Please can you do the following:
 
1.      Republish with the motions in a new order (as immediately below)

2.      Make bold the heading for Item 8.

 
Item 4: MOTION - On ICANN Bylaw recommendation (15 mins)
 
The work undertaken to deal with the most recent Reconsideration Request
(13-3) highlighted the point that there is no currently defined policy or
process within ICANN that requires the Board of ICANN or the ICANN staff to
consult with the GNSO Council if the Board or staff is acting in
contravention to a statement made by the GNSO Council outside of the policy
development process (PDP).
 
This motion recognises this point and seeks to recommend to the ICANN Board,
a change to the bylaws of ICANN to mandate such consultation in future.
4.1 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Jeff Neumann) 
4.2 Discussion of motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> .
4.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 5: MOTION - To adopt the charter for the Policy & Implementation
Working Group (15 mins)
The issue regarding the boundary between policy development and
implementation work has been a discussion point for some time and it has
been a central theme in the execution of the new gTLD programme. In
addition, the Council has been asked to consider issues for policy guidance
and may well need to look at the evolution of its own work and processes to
accommodate this type of request in future.

ICANN Staff has previously published a paper
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation-framework-08j
an13-en.pdf>  intended to facilitate further community discussions on this
topic.  Further community discussion took place in Beijing and the Council
agreed to form a drafting team to develop a charter for a Working Group to
address the issues that have been raised in the context of the recent
discussions on policy and implementation that affect the GNSO.

This motion seeks to conclude the work of the Drafting Team by adopting the
proposed charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group.

5.1 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
5.2 Discussion of motion.
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> 
5.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 6: MOTION - Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings (15
mins)
 
The ³locking² of a domain name registration associated with UDRP proceedings
is not something that is literally required by the UDRP as written, but is a
practice that has developed around it. As a result, there is no uniform
approach, which has resulted in confusion and misunderstandings. The GNSO
Council initiated a PDP on this specific topic in December 2011 and tasked
the WG to make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the issues
identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings.
 
The PDP Working Group has now submitted its Final Report for GNSO Council
consideration containing 17 full consensus recommendations (see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-final-05jul13-en.pdf).
6.1 Update as necessary
6.2 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Jeff Neumann)
6.3 Discussion of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> 
6.4 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)

 
 
This reflects the order in which they were originally submitted.
 
Thanks,
 
 
Jonathan
 

From: Glen de Saint Géry [mailto:Glen@xxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 16 July 2013 08:28
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public
Meeting in Durban 17 July 2013.
 
Dear All,
Please find the updated Proposed Agenda for the GNSO Council Public Meeting
in Durban 17 July 2013.
There are no substantive changes from the last version.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating
Procedures approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/op-procedures-13jun13-en.pdf%20> >
For convenience:
* An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
* An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 13:00UTC <http://tinyurl.com/bojlrbx>
http://tinyurl.com/k27b5c7
Coordinated Universal Time 13:00 UTC
06:00 Los Angeles; 09:00 Washington; 14:00 London; 15:00 Paris; 01:00
Wellington next day

Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors
should notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.

GNSO Council Public Forum ­ 15h00 - 18h00 (Local Time / Durban)

15h00 ­ 15h45 (Local Time / Durban)

Presentations by Stakeholder Groups and Constituency Leaders

·        Commercial and Business Users Constituency (BC) ­ Elisa Cooper
·        Registries Stakeholder Group(RySG) ­ Keith Drazek
·        Registrars Stakeholder Group (RrSG) ­ Michele Neylon
·        Internet Service Providers and Connectivity Providers  (ISPCP) ­
Tony Holmes
·        Intellectual Property Constituency (IPC) ­  Kristina Rosette
·        Not-for-Profit Operational Concerns Constituency (NPOC)
­Marie-Laure Lemineur
·        Non Commercial Users Constituency (NCUC) ­ Bill Drake
·        Non Commercial Stakeholder Group (NCSG) ­David Cake
15h45 - 18h00 (Local Time / Durban) Onwards
Item 1: Administrative matters (10 mins)
1.1 Roll Call
1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the previous Council meeting per the
GNSO Operating Procedures:
Draft Minutes of the GNSO Council meeting 13 July 2013
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-13jun13-en.htm>  approved
on 10 July 2013.


Item 2: Opening Remarks from Chair (10 mins)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include review of Projects List
<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf>  and Action List
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items> .
Comments or questions arising.

Item 3: Consent agenda
No items
Item 4: MOTION - To adopt the charter for the Policy & Implementation
Working Group (15 mins)
The issue regarding the boundary between policy development and
implementation work has been a discussion point for some time and it has
been a central theme in the execution of the new gTLD programme. In
addition, the Council has been asked to consider issues for policy guidance
and may well need to look at the evolution of its own work and processes to
accommodate this type of request in future.

ICANN Staff has previously published a paper
<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation-framework-08j
an13-en.pdf>  intended to facilitate further community discussions on this
topic.  Further community discussion took place in Beijing and the Council
agreed to form a drafting team to develop a charter for a Working Group to
address the issues that have been raised in the context of the recent
discussions on policy and implementation that affect the GNSO.

This motion seeks to conclude the work of the Drafting Team by adopting the
proposed charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group.

4.1 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
4.2 Discussion of motion.
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> 
4.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 5: MOTION - On ICANN Bylaw recommendation (15 mins)
 
The work undertaken to deal with the most recent Reconsideration Request
(13-3) highlighted the point that there is no currently defined policy or
process within ICANN that requires the Board of ICANN or the ICANN staff to
consult with the GNSO Council if the Board or staff is acting in
contravention to a statement made by the GNSO Council outside of the policy
development process (PDP).
 
This motion recognises this point and seeks to recommend to the ICANN Board,
a change to the bylaws of ICANN to mandate such consultation in future.
5.1 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Jeff Neumann) 
5.2 Discussion of motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> .
5.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 6: MOTION - Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings (15
mins)
 
The ³locking² of a domain name registration associated with UDRP proceedings
is not something that is literally required by the UDRP as written, but is a
practice that has developed around it. As a result, there is no uniform
approach, which has resulted in confusion and misunderstandings. The GNSO
Council initiated a PDP on this specific topic in December 2011 and tasked
the WG to make recommendations to the GNSO Council to address the issues
identified with the locking of a domain name subject to UDRP Proceedings.
 
The PDP Working Group has now submitted its Final Report for GNSO Council
consideration containing 17 full consensus recommendations (see
http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/locking/domain-name-final-05jul13-en.pdf).
6.1 Update as necessary
6.2 Reading of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3>  (Jeff Neumann)
6.3 Discussion of the motion
<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Motions+17+July+201
3> 
6.4 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 7: UPDATE AND DISCUSSION ­ Proposed GNSO Council Letter on IDN Variants
(15 mins)
 
During its meeting in Beijing, the ICANN Board requested that, by 1 July
2013, interested Supporting Organizations and Advisory Committees provide
staff with any input and guidance they may have to be factored into
implementation of the Recommendations from the Report on User Experience
Implications of Active Variant TLDs
<http://www.icann.org/en/resources/idn/variant-tlds/active-ux-21mar13-en.pdf
> ' (see 
http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/prelim-report-11apr13-en.htm#
2.a 
<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/board/documents/prelim-report-11apr13-en.htm
#2.a> ). The Report on User Experience Implications of Active Variant TLDs
examines potential challenges from a user experience perspective when
variants of IDN TLDs are activated and offers recommendations to users to
minimize risks and optimize the implementation.
 
Ideally, input is requested on:
a)   Which recommendations if any, are pre-requisites to the delegation of
any IDN variant TLDs (i.e., delegation of IDN Variant TLDs should not
proceed until these recommendations are implemented),
b)   Which recommendations, if any, can be deferred until a later time, and
c)   Which recommendations, if any, require additional policy work by the
ICANN community and should be referred to the relevant stakeholder group for
further policy work
 
On 30 June 2013, a letter was sent to the ICANN Board confirming that this
work was being undertaken within the JIG (Joint ccNSO-GNSO IDN Group) and
that a response for consideration by the GNSO Council as well as the ccNSO
Council would be tabled at the ICANN meeting in Durban. Accordingly, an
extension of deadline to 19 July 2013 was requested.

 

Here, we review the proposed response, in the form of a letter from the
Chair of the GNSO Council to the ICANN Board and give consideration to
approving such a letter.

 

http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/40023

7.1 Discussion
7.2 Next steps

Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSSION ­ GNSO Review (15 mins)

The GNSO Council has previously discussed the action it may take in
anticipation of an ICANN Board initiated review.

Under this item, the Council will receive an update with the latest
information on the likely timing and detail of the Board initiated review.
On the basis of the latest information, the Council will decide on what, if
any, next steps are to be taken

8.1 - Update
8.2 - Discussion
8.3 - Next steps
Item 9: DISCUSSION ­ Cross Community Working Groups (15 mins)
The GNSO has previously drafted a set of Principles on Cross Community
working groups and circulated these widely for comment and input.

https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30345124
<https://community.icann.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=30345124>

In response to the GNSO Council request to provide feed-back from the
broader community, a paper was adopted at the ccNSO Council meeting on 11
June 2013. The ccNSO Council looks forward to further dialogue on this
topic.

9.1 - Review CCNSO paper
9.2 - Discussion
9.3 - Next steps
Item 10: DISCUSSION ­ Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services (10
mins)
The Expert Working Group on gTLD Directory Services has published its
initial report.

http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report-
24jun13-en.pdf 
<http://www.icann.org/en/groups/other/gtld-directory-services/initial-report
-24jun13-en.pdf> 

The EWG is seeking input prior to presenting a final report containing
recommended design principles, features, and a suggested Model to ICANN's
CEO and Board. 

Further, the EWG have stated their expectation that upon conclusion of the
EWG¹s deliberations, the Final Report will serve as a foundation for new
gTLD policy and contractual negotiations, as appropriate. And; as specified
by the Board, an issues report based on the Final Report will form the basis
of a Board-initiated, tightly focused GNSO policy development process (PDP).

Recognition of the need to work within the framework of established GNSO
operating principles has been emphasised in correspondence between the GNSO
Council and the EWG.

All input received by August 12 will be carefully considered as the EWG
finalise recommendations and bring their work to a conclusion. Therefore,
the GNSO Council needs to decide what, if any, action is appropriate at this
stage.

10.1 ­ Consider EWG Initial Report
10.2 - Discussion
10.3 - Next steps

Item 11:  Any Other Business (5 min)
 
Item 12: Open Microphone (10 mins)
ICANN Meetings are intended to maximise interaction within the broader
community.  An open microphone session provides the opportunity for input
from contributors other than GNSO Councillors and all such input is welcome
in the form of questions, comments or suggestions.

Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section
3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the
GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council
motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House.
The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO
actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described
in Annex A <http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA> ):
requires an affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or
more than two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter
approved under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to
the Charter through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause,
upon a motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of
termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one
GNSO Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain
Contracting Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a
two-thirds vote of the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus,
the GNSO Supermajority vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by
the ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended
by the GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a
majority of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 4.4
<http://gnso.icann.org/council/gnso-operating-procedures-22sep11-en.pdf> )
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN
Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the
announced time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting¹s
adjournment. In exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the
vote, the Chair may reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7
calendar days, provided such amendment is verbally confirmed by all
Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee
votes according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting
by telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may
become available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be
a quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between March and October, Summer in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 13:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA (PST
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html> )
UTC-8+1DST 06:00 
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+1DST 09:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+1DST 10:00
Montevideo, Uruguay (UYST
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html> )
UTC-3+1DST 10:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 14:00
Abuja, Nigeria (WAT
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/africa/wat.html>
) UTC+1+0DST 14:00
Durban South Africa (SAST) UTC+2+0DST 15:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 15:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 15:00
Ramat Hasharon, Israel(IST
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.
html> ) UTC+2+0DST 16:00
Karachi, Pakistan (PKT
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/pkt.html>
) UTC+5+0DST 18:00 
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 21:00
Perth, Australia (WST
<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html> )
UTC+8+0DST 21:00 
Wellington, New Zealand (NZDT
<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/pacific/nzdt.htm
l>  ) UTC+12+1DST 01:00 (next day)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of October 2013, 2:00 or 3:00 local time
(with exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
http://tinyurl.com/k27b5c7
 
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://gnso.icann.org <http://gnso.icann.org/>
 


Attachment: GNSOPublic Meeting 17 July _ LH.ppt
Description: MS-Powerpoint presentation

Attachment: Draft Agendav3- GNSO Public Council meeting in DURBAN 17 July_LH.doc
Description: MS-Word document

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature



<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>