<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
Re: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
Sorry for the confusion -- did this supersede the earlier draft? If so, I'm
fine with this one.
On Jun 18, 2013, at 1:03 PM, Neuman, Jeff wrote:
> I am good with this.
>
> Jeffrey J. Neuman
> Neustar, Inc. / Vice President, Business Affairs
>
>
> From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Novoa, Osvaldo
> Sent: Tuesday, June 18, 2013 3:53 PM
> To: 'jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx'; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: RE: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
>
> All,
> I support this draft.
> Best regards,
> Osvaldo
>
> De: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
> nombre de Jonathan Robinson
> Enviado el: Martes, 18 de Junio de 2013 16:41
> Para: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Asunto: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
>
> All,
>
> I believe that the draft below reflects the position where we have got to so
> far. I do not feel we have consensus on specific requests, only that the BGC
> be aware of the current position.
>
> I trust you will be able to support this and recognise I have attempted to
> deal with this in as balanced and constructive a way as possible given the
> very tight timeline.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Jonathan
>
>
> Dear Bruce and Colleagues on the Board Governance Committee,
>
> I am writing to you in my capacity as chair of the GNSO Council.
>
> As you are no doubt aware, the rationale prepared for the reconsideration
> request 13.3 has been the subject of significant Council and broader
> community discussion.
>
> Concerns with the rationale, expressed by a number of Councillors, revolve
> around the extent to which the rationale may effectively set precedent and
> the associated impact on the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. In other words,
> there is a view that the implications of the rationale go beyond the scope of
> dealing with the reconsideration request to which they pertain.
>
> In the short time available since the Council first discussed this at our 13
> June 2013 meeting, we have not yet formed a consensus or agreed GNSO Council
> position.
>
> Nevertheless, I feel it is appropriate to flag with you the strength of views
> of on this this subject.
>
> I trust that you will take this input to your business in the constructive
> spirit in which it is intended.
>
> Yours sincerely,
>
>
>
> Jonathan Robinson
> Chair, ICANN GNSO Council
>
>
> El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto está dirigido
> únicamente al destinatario del mensaje y contiene información que puede ser
> confidencial. Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al
> remitente respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el
> e-mail y los posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Está
> prohibida cualquier utilización, difusión o copia de este e-mail por
> cualquier persona o entidad que no sean las específicas destinatarias del
> mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier
> comunicación que haya sido emitida incumpliendo nuestra Política de Seguridad
> de la Información
>
>
> This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the
> addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender
> immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached
> files. Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity
> that is not the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible
> for any communication emitted without respecting our Information Security
> Policy.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|