<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
- To: "'jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx'" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
- From: "Novoa, Osvaldo" <onovoa@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2013 16:52:32 -0300
- Accept-language: es-ES, es-UY
- Acceptlanguage: es-ES, es-UY
- In-reply-to: <01e701ce6c5b$d4c55910$7e500b30$@afilias.info>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- References: <01e701ce6c5b$d4c55910$7e500b30$@afilias.info>
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Thread-index: Ac5sWfdqGSuoJB1uSHOFIATxXImI5gAA1zyw
- Thread-topic: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
All,
I support this draft.
Best regards,
Osvaldo
________________________________
De: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] En
nombre de Jonathan Robinson
Enviado el: Martes, 18 de Junio de 2013 16:41
Para: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Asunto: [council] Rationale for Reconsideration Request 13.3
All,
I believe that the draft below reflects the position where we have got to so
far. I do not feel we have consensus on specific requests, only that the BGC
be aware of the current position.
I trust you will be able to support this and recognise I have attempted to deal
with this in as balanced and constructive a way as possible given the very
tight timeline.
Thanks,
Jonathan
Dear Bruce and Colleagues on the Board Governance Committee,
I am writing to you in my capacity as chair of the GNSO Council.
As you are no doubt aware, the rationale prepared for the reconsideration
request 13.3 has been the subject of significant Council and broader community
discussion.
Concerns with the rationale, expressed by a number of Councillors, revolve
around the extent to which the rationale may effectively set precedent and the
associated impact on the ICANN multi-stakeholder model. In other words, there
is a view that the implications of the rationale go beyond the scope of dealing
with the reconsideration request to which they pertain.
In the short time available since the Council first discussed this at our 13
June 2013 meeting, we have not yet formed a consensus or agreed GNSO Council
position.
Nevertheless, I feel it is appropriate to flag with you the strength of views
of on this this subject.
I trust that you will take this input to your business in the constructive
spirit in which it is intended.
Yours sincerely,
Jonathan Robinson
Chair, ICANN GNSO Council
________________________________
El presente correo y cualquier posible archivo adjunto est? dirigido ?nicamente
al destinatario del mensaje y contiene informaci?n que puede ser confidencial.
Si Ud. no es el destinatario correcto por favor notifique al remitente
respondiendo anexando este mensaje y elimine inmediatamente el e-mail y los
posibles archivos adjuntos al mismo de su sistema. Est? prohibida cualquier
utilizaci?n, difusi?n o copia de este e-mail por cualquier persona o entidad
que no sean las espec?ficas destinatarias del mensaje. ANTEL no acepta ninguna
responsabilidad con respecto a cualquier comunicaci?n que haya sido emitida
incumpliendo nuestra Pol?tica de Seguridad de la Informaci?n
This e-mail and any attachment is confidential and is intended solely for the
addressee(s). If you are not intended recipient please inform the sender
immediately, answering this e-mail and delete it as well as the attached files.
Any use, circulation or copy of this e-mail by any person or entity that is not
the specific addressee(s) is prohibited. ANTEL is not responsible for any
communication emitted without respecting our Information Security Policy.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|