<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
RE: [council] Draft Statement for Public Forum
- To: "Jonathan Robinson" <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>, "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: RE: [council] Draft Statement for Public Forum
- From: john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:06:52 -0700
- In-reply-to: <CAJZFnPrz6Fy7YbjSQLkdgc_e-CZqP-0MR4vhnQTLVfy0ivetEQ@mail.gmail.com>
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: MailAPI 24256
Jonathan,
I am good with this.
Berard
--------- Original Message ---------Subject: [council] Draft Statement for
Public Forum
From: Jonathan Robinson <jrobinson@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 4/10/13 3:54 am
To: "GNSO Council List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Draft Statement for Public Forum:
The GNSO Council recently provided advice in response to a letter from the CEO
to the effect that an issue being considered was a matter of policy, rather
than implementation. It was Staff’s view that the issue was implementation and
not policy, and accordingly it was the Staff’s decision to proceed with the
first steps of implementation. It is the Council’s firmly held view that when
there is not an agreement on whether or not such an item is policy, as in this
case, that the Staff must refer back to the Council before proceeding further.
Indeed, as a general point, it is the Council’s view that should it provide
policy advice to the Staff and/or the Board in the future, then in the event
that Staff and/or Board seek to act adverse to the Council’s advice, they
should certainly not do so without further reference back to the Council.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|