RE: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Ching, Joy & Petter.

 

Idea from ccNSO was to have a 2 from each sides type structure, to include
or exclude liasons (i.e. up to 3) to keep it smallish.

 

From: ching.chiao@xxxxxxxxx [mailto:ching.chiao@xxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Ching Chiao [Registry.Asia]
Sent: 14 March 2013 14:32
To: Jonathan Robinson; council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] Meet wiht ccNSO in Beijing

 

Hi Jonathan -- I'd like to volunteer for this group. Thanks!

 

Ching

 

 


On 14/03/2013 7:13 a.m., Jonathan Robinson wrote:
> All,
>
>
>
> We have the opportunity to meet with the ccNSO Beijing and have a
> scheduled a meeting slot to do so.  In order for it to go ahead and
> have a good chance of succeeding, we need to plan for it in
> advance.
>
>
>
> Last week, I talked with Lesley Cowley (ccNSO Chair) to discuss
> the potential for the meeting and the possible agenda items,
> including those which had been suggested by Wolfgang, Maria and
> Petter and possibly others on our mailing list.  The objective in
> talking with Leslie objective was to come up with a number of areas
> which are likely to be of mutual interest and then to find an
> agreed way for developing and preparing for these for discussion
> together.
>
>
>
> We reviewed a number of areas / topics and came out with a
> non-exclusive short-list that seemed to be of mutual interest as
> follows:
>
>
>
> 1.       Providing input and advice, often at short notice. A
> discussion and sharing of the experience of dealing with the
> various requests that come to both of our groups in order to
> provide advice or input, often at short notice or at unpredictable
> times, and not linked to current scheduled work.  This discussion
> topic could include and link into the broader issue and experience
> of capacity planning, work group participation and work scheduling
> and planning where the ccNSO has some interesting approaches.
>
> 2.       The impact of gTLDs on ICANN. How significant might this
> be and are existing structures and approaches adequate to absorb
> and deal with this?
>
> 3.       Global Internet Governance. Looking at issues on an
> international level and how these may impact on ICANN and the
> multi-stakeholder model.  Shared experiences from global forums and
> the issues and lessons arriving.
>
>
>
> We agreed that organising and preparing for an agenda containing
> some or all of the above (or indeed any other relevant topics) was
> best handled by a smaller group comprised of members of both GNSO &
> ccNSO. This type of approach as worked well for the ccNSO in the
> past.  The group could comprise a couple of reps from each of GNSO
> and ccNSO and include the liaisons (if not already one of the two)
> so making a manageable small group of 4-6 people.
>
>
>
> I trust that you will be supportive of this approach or something
> similar and look forward to any comments or input.  If you would
> like to volunteer to be on the small group which will organise and
> plan for this session, please do so.
>
>
>
> Thank-you,
>
>
>
>
>
> Jonathan
>
>
>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRQd5hAAoJEA9zUGgfM+bqPkoH/A3EyZyiZ8MohHv6wUlEGtae
Bvq1QN81S1b45Ky3Tn2WWaLU7XZpNZ0vIrOVRygMKhOwNJh+mLrMXmbiLBDWkPhP
VpBDS6BXLww4/zT46N8LACUzndUdfK70SKx0WCJnWhF4vf1OThFohZOnki6JuIgW
OVNP0wSaMMcIHaQmapn7VOOfojQIwDwD2IJmUQ/LQDH3BCLerqW8Go3KIbr7F930
JxqmXt510qLkUOYk6X3mB0qEd0QhC9nMF24MJM1sIE/nk4tUhLihOKt5o24e01Zm
Nnjjvlk9nRjMR8GJLhjvd/DdVxrP39Lm95CuvqUc2e6XmJqyLLEsjJ0P+97XeoI=
=BsDJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----