Volker,
You will have seen Jeff's suggestion to discuss this at the Council
meeting on Thurs.
I expect that we will hear from you on the topic. I have asked Jeff
to lead but please free to discuss with Jeff and even to consider
leading the topic yourself.
Especially important (from a Council perspective) is your view on the
impact on ICANN policy making processes / the multi-stakeholder model.
Thanks,
Jonathan
*From:*owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] *On Behalf Of *Volker Greimann
*Sent:* 08 March 2013 14:10
*Cc:* council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List
*Subject:* Re: [council] Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment
To complete the set of documents, I am fowarding the statement of the
RrSG Negotiation Team on the current state of the negotiations.
Please note that the proposal currently envisioned by ICANN will
effectively move the policy development process from the GNSO to the
board.
Most of the still contentious areas of the agreement are additions
ICANN staff made this February after having let the negotiations
languish in pause-mode for three months after the Toronto meeting and
contain items that were never discussed with the registrar negotiation
team since first proposed, due to other "matters of higher urgency".
This agreement is a portent of things to come and of a move away from
the multi-stakeholder model to a top-down structure.
Registrar Stakeholder Group Negotiating Team (Registrar NT)
statement regarding RAA negotiations
After nearly 18 months of negotiations with ICANN over a new Registrar
Accreditation Agreement (RAA), formal negotiations have concluded. The posting
of a "proposed" 2013 RAA by ICANN for public comment signals that ICANN staff
believes that negotiations have concluded and the remaining issues will not be
resolved.
The Registrars' NT disagrees. To be clear, this is NOT the outcome that
registrars wanted, and they remain ready and willing to continue negotiations.
Prior to the Toronto ICANN meeting (October 2012), all parties acknowledged
that they were very close to agreement on all remaining issues. The process
appeared to be reaching a favorable conclusion and when ICANN CEO Fadi Chehadé
communicated his desire to have RAA negotiations wrapped up by the end of 2012,
registrars felt it was an ambitious timeframe, but one worth pursuing for the
benefit of all parties.
When negotiations finally resumed in February 2013 much to the surprise of
registrars, the few remaining issues were not the only items under discussion.
ICANN staff presented a list of 10 brand new items for inclusion in the
agreement, under the pretext of enhancing the "public interest." Furthermore,
these new items came along with an arbitrary deadline and decision to link the
2013 RAA to the new gTLD timeline.
Among these new demands was a Registrant Rights and Responsibilities document
(R3), a temporary privacy accreditation program and a requirement that
registrars accept and implement recommendations of the WHOIS Expert Working
Group, which had yet to be formed and whose work is just beginning.
Although registrars were surprised by these new demands, registrars worked in
good faith with ICANN to accommodate its intentions. For example, registrars
consulted with their members to fine-tune the R3 document to make it easier to
understand and readily translatable in other languages.
Some of the other new items for inclusion transcend the RAA and could affect
the entirety of the multi-stakeholder model. For example, ICANN insisted on
including a proposed Revocation (or "blow up") Clause that would have given
them the ability to unilaterally terminate all registrar accreditations. After
major pushback, ICANN staff relented and in its place proposed giving the ICANN
Board the ability to unilaterally amend the RAA. This is identical to what
ICANN inserted into the proposed new gTLD registry agreement--a clause met with
strong opposition not only from the Registry Stakeholder Group but from the
broader ICANN community.
The effect of such a clause in the primary agreements between ICANN and its
commercial stakeholders would be devastating to the bottom-up,
multi-stakeholder model. First, it will effectively mean the end of the GNSO's
PDP, as the Board will become the central arena for all controversial issues,
not the community. Second, it creates an imbalance of authority in the ICANN
model, with no limits on the scope or frequency of unilateral amendments, and
no protections for registrars and more important registrants.
In addition to the new items for inclusion there was a surprise announcement
that all new gTLD registries must only use registrars that have signed the 2013
RAA, a transparent effort by ICANN to arbitrarily link the new gTLD program to
the outcome of RAA negotiations. This requirement would create separate
"classes" or "levels" of registrars, which is unprecedented in the DNS
industry. There can and must be only one meaning of "ICANN-Accredited."
All of the items that have been agreed to over the past 18 months would, by
themselves, produce an RAA that is vastly improved over the current 2009
version. If adopted, that RAA would significantly raise performance
requirements for every ICANN accredited registrar and bring dramatic
improvements to the domain name ecosystem. Nearly all of the Law Enforcement
requests that were endorsed by the GAC have been included, as well as the major
items that were requested by the GNSO are included in that RAA. That RAA would
bring registrant verification. That RAA would bring enhanced compliance tools.
Registrars must emphasize that the key differences between that RAA and the one
currently proposed by ICANN are not issues raised by Law Enforcement, GAC or
the GNSO but by ICANN staff.
It now moves to the greater ICANN community to review these competing draft
RAAs, and registrars look forward to those public discussions. We welcome
engagement with all stakeholders on the new 2013 RAA, and what it means for
registrars, registrants, and the management of the DNS as a whole.
https://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/proposed-raa-07mar13-en.htm
Proposed 2013 RAA Posted for Comment
Comment / Reply Periods (*)
Comment Open Date:
7 March 2013
Comment Close Date:
28 March 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Reply Open Date:
29 March 2013
Reply Close Date:
19 April 2013 - 23:59 UTC
Important Information Links
Public Comment Announcement
<https://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-07mar13-en.htm>
To Submit Your Comments (Forum)
<mailto:comments-proposed-raa-07mar13@xxxxxxxxx>
View Comments Submitted
<http://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-proposed-raa-07mar13/>
Brief Overview
Originating Organization:
ICANN
Categories/Tags:
* Contracted Party Agreements
Purpose (Brief):
ICANN is seeking public comments on a Proposed 2013 Registrar
Accreditation Agreement (RAA), particularly on areas where ICANN
and the Registrar Negotiating Team have not been able to reach
agreement in principle. This represents the first time in the
nearly 18 months of negotiations that community comment is
formally sought on this document.
Current Status:
ICANN and the Registrar Negotiating Team commenced negotiation on
amendments to the RAA in October 2011. While the documents posted
today show many areas of agreement, there are differences between
the ICANN and Registrar positions are highlighted. In addition,
further discussion is still ongoing regarding some of the
specifications to the agreement.
Next Steps:
After review of the comment received, the proposed 2013 RAA will
be reviewed to determine if further changes are warranted. In
addition, ICANN and the Registrar NT are likely to continue
discussions regarding the areas where the specifications remain
open. The ultimate goal is to have a 2013 RAA completed and
approved in the near future.
Staff Contact:
Samantha Eisner, Senior Counsel
Email Staff Contact
<mailto:samantha.eisner@xxxxxxxxx?subject=More%20information%20on%20the%20Proposed%202013%20RAA%20Posted%20for%20Comment%20public%20comment%20period>
Detailed Information
Section I: Description, Explanation, and Purpose:
After nearly 18 months of negotiations, ICANN is posting a new
version of the proposed 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement
(RAA) for public comment.
The Registrar Negotiating Team (NT) has continued to engage in
good faith negotiations to understand ICANN's perspective with
respect to the outstanding issues, and to share the often
divergent positions within the Registrar Stakeholder Group.
Recently, additional revisions were proposed by ICANN's
Negotiating Team stemming from the call by ICANN's CEO, Fadi
Chehadé, to work to improve the image of the domain industry and
to protect registrants through a further updated contractual
framework. The Registrar NT considered each of these new issues,
and worked towards finding solutions where appropriate. The RAA
posted today reflects hard-fought concessions on many of key
issues raised throughout the negotiations, and highlights issues
remaining in order for the final 2013 RAA agreement to be reached.
Throughout the RAA and its Specifications, there are portions
where two versions of draft text appear side by side. These
highlight areas where ICANN and the Registrars have not been able
to reach agreement in principle on an issue, therefore both
positions are provided for comment. Unless otherwise noted, the
remainder of the document reflects agreements in principle among
ICANN and the Registrar NT.
A fuller discussion of the status of negotiations and areas of
difference is available in ICANN's RAA Posting Memorandum
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/memo-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
66 KB].
Section II: Background:
The current round of negotiations over the RAA began in October
2011. ICANN and the Registrar Negotiation Team have presented
updates to the community at each of ICANN's public meetings since
that time. Information on the history of the negotiations,
including previously released documentation, is available at the
community wiki at
https://community.icann.org/display/RAA/Negotiations+Between+ICANN+and+Registrars+to+Amend+the+Registrar+Accreditation+Agreement.
This
includes the group of documents posted in June 2012, which
demonstrated the progress to date in the negotiations.
Section III: Document and Resource Links:
There are multiple documents for review as part of this posting.
The new RAA is anticipated to be a base document with a series of
specifications attached. This posting includes all documents that
are currently anticipated to be part of the 2013 a. As noted
above, a fuller discussion of the status of negotiations and areas
of difference is available in ICANN's RAA Posting Memorandum
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/memo-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
66 KB].
The base RAA documents:
* Proposed 2013 RAA, Annotated to Show Differences Between ICANN
and Registrar Positions
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-agreement-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
281 KB]
* Redline showing changes between Proposed 2013 RAA and the June
2012 RAA Posting
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-agreement-03jun12-redline-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
205 KB]
* Redline showing changes between Proposed 2013 RAA and the 2009
RAA
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-agreement-2009-redline-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
259 KB]
* A Summary of Changes from the June 2012 RAA Posting
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-agreement-summary-changes-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
268 KB] is also available.
The Specifications and Addendums:
For the Consensus and Temporary Policy Specification, the Data
Retention Specification, and the Whois Accuracy Program
Specification, each is available in annotated format to show where
differences remain with the registrars, as well as redlines
showing the differences in the documents from the 2012 posting.
* Proposed Consensus and Temporary Policy Specification,
Annotated to Show Differences Between ICANN and Registrar
Positions
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-consensus-temporary-policy-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
121 KB]
* Redline showing changes between to the Consensus and Temporary
Policy Specification and the June 2012 Version
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-consensus-temporary-policy-redline-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
95 KB]
* Proposed Data Retention Specification, Annotated to Show
Differences Between ICANN and Registrar Positions
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-data-retention-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
113 KB]
* Redline showing changes between to the Data Retention
Specification and the June 2012 Version
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-data-retention-redline-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
118 KB]
* Proposed Whois Accuracy Program Specification, Annotated to
Show Differences Between ICANN and Registrar Positions
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-whois-accuracy-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
116 KB]
* Redline showing changes between to the Whois Accuracy Program
Specification and the June 2012 Version
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-whois-accuracy-redline-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
142 KB]
For the remaining specifications to the RAA, the versions below
are provided as ICANN's latest proposal. The Registrar Negotiation
Team is still considering each of these specifications:
* Proposed Registrant Rights and Responsibilities Specification
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrant-rights-responsibilities-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
48 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Specification on Proxy/Privacy Services
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-privacy-proxy-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
70 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Additional Registrar Operation Specification
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-additional-operation-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
78 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Registrar Information Specification
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-registrar-information-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
76 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Whois Specification
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-whois-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
160 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Compliance Certificate
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-compliance-certificate-07mar13-en.pdf>
[PDF, 64 KB]
* ICANN Proposed Transition Addendum
<https://www.icann.org/en/resources/registrars/raa/proposed-transition-addendum-07mar13-en.pdf>[PDF,
63 KB]
Section IV: Additional Information:
None
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(*) Comments submitted after the posted Close Date/Time are not
guaranteed to be considered in any final summary, analysis,
reporting, or decision-making that takes place once this period
lapses.
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org