ICANN/GNSO GNSO Email List Archives

[council]


<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>

RE: [council] FW: [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks

  • To: "'Jonathan Robinson'" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'GNSO Council'" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Subject: RE: [council] FW: [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks
  • From: "Neuman, Jeff" <Jeff.Neuman@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2013 13:31:38 -0400
  • Accept-language: en-US
  • Acceptlanguage: en-US
  • List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Thread-index: AQG8QTulEn+5fu9JdtxPoFipj/KLiZjEYvKwgAAXKUo=
  • Thread-topic: [council] FW: [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks

I could moderate it sure. I would expect the registrar reps to weigh in heavily 
as well.



Best regards,

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Sent from iPad.  Please excuse any typos.


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Jonathan Robinson [mailto:jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Monday, March 11, 2013 12:10 PM Eastern Standard Time
To:     Neuman, Jeff; 'GNSO Council'
Subject:        RE: [council] FW: [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks

Thanks Jeff,

We just had the preparatory call for the Council meeting on Thurs and I am / we 
are OK with adding this to the agenda.

Are you OK to lead the topic?

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On 
Behalf Of Neuman, Jeff
Sent: 08 March 2013 12:20
To: 'GNSO Council'
Subject: [council] FW: [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks


All,

I saw ICANN's memo on the RAA negotiations, but did not see them post the 
Registrars' memo which I believe is unfortunate.  There are always two sides to 
every story and unfortunately I did not see them both represented.

I would like to see if we can devote some time during the Council meeting to 
discuss the last minute changes to the registries and registrars agreements.  I 
agree with the Registrars that with these last minute changes proposed, there 
is a challenge presented to the PDP process and frankly the GNSO's ongoing role 
that should be addressed.

Best regards,

Jeffrey J. Neuman

Sent from iPad.  Please excuse any typos.


 -----Original Message-----
From:   Michele Neylon :: Blacknight [mailto:michele@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent:   Friday, March 08, 2013 04:01 AM Eastern Standard Time
To:     At-Large Worldwide; ALAC WHOIS WG; New gTLD Review Group
Subject:        [At-Large] RrSG Statement on RAA Talks

As you will discover today ICANN has published "a" version of the new RAA for 
comment. As this impacts on multiple topics / themes you'll have to excuse me 
for cross-posting this The Registrar SG Negotiating Team feel this publication 
was premature and have issued a statement:

http://michele.cat/22

Regards

Michele


Mr Michele Neylon
Blacknight Solutions ♞
Hosting & Domains
ICANN Accredited Registrar
http://www.blacknight.co
http://blog.blacknight.com/
Intl. +353 (0) 59  9183072
US: 213-233-1612
Locall: 1850 929 929
Facebook: http://fb.me/blacknight
Twitter: http://twitter.com/mneylon
-------------------------------
Blacknight Internet Solutions Ltd, Unit 12A,Barrowside Business Park,Sleaty 
Road,Graiguecullen,Carlow,Ireland  Company No.: 370845


_______________________________________________
At-Large mailing list
At-Large@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://atlarge-lists.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/at-large

At-Large Official Site: http://atlarge.icann.org





<<< Chronological Index >>>    <<< Thread Index >>>