[council] Re: [council] Re: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team

["Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thanks Alan, you're right.
I was just referring to the ICANN website
http://www.icann.org/en/about/aoc-review/atrt/1/composition where Becky
and Willie are on the list.

Re GAC participation don't forget Larry Strickling who adds another
governmental representative.

Best regards

Wolf Ulrich


-----Original Message-----
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 01:07:44 +0100
Subject: Re: [council] Re: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team
From: Alan Greenberg <alan.greenberg@xxxxxxxxx>
To: "Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx" <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>,
Jonathan Robinson <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'"
<Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>


Wolf-Urich, that analysis is not quite correct.

The GNSO is down 2, not 3, because Willie Currie resigned and was 
replaced by Carlos Affonso Pereira de Souza. Also, the ccNSO was 
stable with 2 representatives because Becky Burr resigned and was 
replaced by Chris Disspain.

Also note that the Ex-Officio GAC seat (for the Chair or delegate) 
adds one to the GAC count. Last time it was Manal Ismail representing 
the GAC Chair. She was Vice-chair of the RT, so it was not just a 
nominal non-participating slot.

Alan

At 17/02/2013 04:37 PM, Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
>See the comparison attached. GAC and ALAC reps have been increased at
>the expense of GNSO and ccNSO, 1 SSAC was added. The total number of
>reps has been decreased by 1.
>
>Wolf-Ulrich
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>Date: Sun, 17 Feb 2013 20:23:29 +0100
>Subject: RE: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team
>From: "Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>To: <Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx>, "'Bruce Tonkin'"
><Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
>
>Wolf,
>
>Yes, congratulations to Brian and Avri for sure.
>
>And, agreed, for the Council / GNSO there are two possible takes from
>this:
>
>1. That we need to work harder to secure greater representation next
>time.
>OR
>2. That the balance was inevitably likely to shift in any case this
time
>around given the current environment.
>
>It would be interesting and illustrative to see a side-by-side
>comparison
>table of representation in ATRT1 & ATRT 2.
>
>Jonathan
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
>On
>Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx
>Sent: 17 February 2013 08:13
>To: Bruce Tonkin
>Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team
>
>
>All,
>
>Last time the GNSO insisted from the beginning of the selection process
>on 4
>ATRT seats which has been confirmed before the final selection. This
>time we
>"hoped" more or less that the selectors would adopt the same structure.
>But the lesson learned now is: what's not written beforehand in stone
>doesn't count.
>
>The next round may happen in around 2 years....
>
>Regards
>
>Wolf-Ulrich
>
>Am 16.02.2013 um 06:08 schrieb Bruce Tonkin
><Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
>
> >
> > Hello All,
> >
> > See:
>http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15feb13-en.htm
> >
> > I see that two have been selected from the GNSO.
> >
> > Avri Doria from the Non-Contracted party house, and Brian Cute from
>the
>Contracted party house.
> >
> > I gather last time that the GNSO had 4 people.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Bruce Tonkin
> >
> > TRTe
>
>