RE: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team

["Jonathan Robinson" <jonathan.robinson@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

Wolf,

Yes, congratulations to Brian and Avri for sure.

And, agreed, for the Council / GNSO there are two possible takes from this:

1. That we need to work harder to secure greater representation next time.
OR
2. That the balance was inevitably likely to shift in any case this time
around given the current environment.

It would be interesting and illustrative to see a side-by-side comparison
table of representation in ATRT1 & ATRT 2.

Jonathan

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
Behalf Of Wolf-Ulrich.Knoben@xxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: 17 February 2013 08:13
To: Bruce Tonkin
Cc: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [council] ICANN announces ATRT2 review team


All,

Last time the GNSO insisted from the beginning of the selection process on 4
ATRT seats which has been confirmed before the final selection. This time we
"hoped" more or less that the selectors would adopt the same structure.
But the lesson learned now is: what's not written beforehand in stone
doesn't count.

The next round may happen in around 2 years....

Regards

Wolf-Ulrich

Am 16.02.2013 um 06:08 schrieb Bruce Tonkin
<Bruce.Tonkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:

> 
> Hello All,
> 
> See:
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-2-15feb13-en.htm
> 
> I see that two have been selected from the GNSO.
> 
> Avri Doria from the Non-Contracted party house, and Brian Cute from the
Contracted party house.   
> 
> I gather last time that the GNSO had 4 people.  
> 
> Regards,
> Bruce Tonkin
> 
> TRTe