[council] GNSO Council Meeting Agenda Thursday, 14 February 2013 at 11:00UTC:

[Glen de Saint Géry <Glen@xxxxxxxxx>]

Dear Councillors,
Please find the draft agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting on:
The agenda is published on pages:
http://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar#feb
http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/agenda-council-14feb13-en.htm

On the Wiki at:
https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Agenda+-+14+February+2013

Agenda for the GNSO Council Meeting 14 February 2013
This agenda was established according to the GNSO Council Operating Procedures 
approved 13 September 2012 for the GNSO Council and updated.
http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/gnso-operating-procedures-13sep12-en.pdf
For convenience:

 *   An excerpt of the ICANN Bylaws defining the voting thresholds is provided 
in Appendix 1 at the end of this agenda.
 *   An excerpt from the Council Operating Procedures defining the absentee 
voting procedures is provided in Appendix 2 at the end of this agenda.
Meeting Times 11:00 UTC<http://tinyurl.com/bojlrbx>
http://tinyurl.com/alhxou5

Coordinated Universal Time 11:00 UTC
03:00 Los Angeles; 06:00 Washington; 11:00 London; 12:00 Paris; 00:00 Wellington
Dial-in numbers will be sent individually to Council members. Councilors should 
notify the GNSO Secretariat in advance if a dial out call is needed.
GNSO Council meeting audio cast
http://stream.icann.org:8000/gnso.m3u
Item 1: Administrative matters (10 minutes)
1.1 Roll Call

1.2 Statement of interest updates
1.3 Review/amend agenda
1.4. Note the status of minutes for the Council meeting on 17 January 
2013<http://gnso.icann.org/en/meetings/minutes-council-17jan13-en.htm> have 
been approved per the GNSO Operating Procedures and the minutes of the Council 
meeting on 21 January 
2013<http://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg14133.html> will 
be approved on 8 February 2013 per the GNSO Operating Procedures:
Item 2: Opening Remarks from Chair (5 minutes)
Review focus areas and provide updates on specific key themes / topics
Include brief review of Projects 
List<http://gnso.icann.org/meetings/projects-list.pdf> and Action 
List<https://community.icann.org/display/gnsocouncilmeetings/Action+Items>
Item 3: Consent agenda (0 minutes)




Item 4: INFORMATION & DISCUSION - Recent meetings in Amsterdam & LA (15 minutes)
Meetings have recently taken place in Amsterdam & LA.  This item provides an 
opportunity for an update on any key themes or issues arising.
4.1 Update from VCs (Mason Cole & Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
4.2 Discussion
4.3 Next steps (if any)

Item 5: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) Strawman Proposal 
and Defensive Registrations (15 Minutes)

ICANN's CEO has requested GNSO Council input on the Strawman 
Proposal<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/chehade-to-robinson-04dec12-en.pdf>
  developed through the TMCH related implementation discussions, which has been 
posted for public comment. 
http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30nov12-en.htm.  
ICANN's CEO additionally requested Council input on the joint proposal from the 
Business Constituency/Intellectual Property Constituency (BC/IPC) for a 
"limited preventative registration mechanism" which is also currently available 
for public comment.  A subsequent note (19 December 2012) from ICANN's CEO 
clarified the desired deadline for input to be no later than 22 February 2013.

Related to this discussion is the Staff briefing paper 
(http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/32287) to the GNSO Council on the topic of 
defensive registrations at the second level, in response to a previous request 
from the New GLTD Committee (2012.04.10.NG2).  The New GTLD Committee requested 
the GNSO to consider whether additional work on defensive registrations at the 
second level should be undertaken.
The Council is to continue to discuss: (i) a response to the ICANN CEOs 
request, and (ii) to consider whether to undertake any additional work related 
to the BC/IPC proposal and/or the Staff briefing paper, on the topic of second 
level defensive registrations.
5.1 Update (Mason Cole)
5.2 Discussion
5.3 Next Steps

Item 6: DISCUSION - Board requested advice on second level protections for 
certain IGO names and acronyms (10 minutes)

At its 26 November 2012 meeting, the Board requested  that the GNSO continue 
its work on policy recommendations on top and second-level protections for 
certain IGO and INGO names on an expedited basis.

In addition, the Board requested that the GNSO Council advise the Board by no 
later than 28 February 2013 if it is aware of any concern such as with the 
global public interest or the security or stability of the DNS, that the Board 
should take into account in making its decision about whether to include second 
level protections for certain IGO names and acronyms by inclusion on a Reserved 
Names List in section 2.2.1.2.3 of the Applicant Guidebook, applicable in all 
new gTLD registries approved in the first round of the New gTLD Program. The 
specific IGO names to be protected shall be those names or acronyms that: 1) 
qualify under the current existing criteria to register a domain name in the 
.int gTLD; and 2) have a registered .int domain OR a determination of 
eligibility under the .int criteria; and 3) apply to ICANN to be listed on the 
reserved names list for the second level prior to the delegation of any new 
gTLDs by no later than 28 February 2013.

6.1 Update (Thomas Rickert)
6.2 Discussion
6.3 Next steps (if any)

Item 7: INFORMATION & DISCUSION - The issue of "closed generic" TLDs (10 
minutes)
The New gTLD Program Committee recently directed the ICANN CEO to request the 
GNSO to provide guidance on the issue of "closed generic" TLDs, , concurrent 
with the opening of the public comment forum and if the GNSO wishes, to provide 
such guidance. Guidance on this issue is requested to be provided by the close 
of the public comment forum. (7 March)

7.1 Update
7.2 Discussion
7.3 Next steps (if any)

Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSION - Policy vs. Implementation (10 minutes)
The recent letter from the GAC as well as activities relating to work on the 
Trademark Clearinghouse, highlights a broader issue regarding the boundary 
between policy development and implementation work as well as the effective 
integration of policy development and integration work from the outset.
Recent discussions on the Council mailing list indicate that there is an 
interest to undertake further work on this issue. At the same time, ICANN Staff 
has published a 
paper<http://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/policy-implementation-framework-08jan13-en.pdf>
  that is intended to facilitate further community discussions on this topic.

8.1 Discussion
8.2 Next steps


Item 9: UPDATE & DISCUSSION - Whois Privacy and Proxy Relay and Reveal Study 
(10 minutes)
At the ICANN Meeting in Toronto, Lyman Chapin presented the results of the 
survey<http://toronto45.icann.org/meetings/toronto2012/presentation-whois-survey-17oct12-en.pdf>
 that evaluated the feasibility of conducting a future in-depth study into 
communication Relay and identity Reveal requests sent for gTLD domain names 
registered using Proxy and Privacy services. The Council should consider 
whether to go ahead with the study.

9.1 - Update from Staff (Barbara Roseman)
9.2 - Discussion
9.3 - Next steps

Item 10: INFORMATION & DISCUSSION - Planning for Beijing (10 minutes)

Making the most out of the face-to-face meeting time available at the ICANN 
Meeting in Beijing will take some planning.  Council VC Mason Cole is working 
with staff to lead this effort. The Council has the opportunity to discuss any 
initial plans and provide feedback

10.1 - Update (Mason Cole)
10.2 - Discussion
10.3 - Next steps

Item 11:  Any Other Business (5 minutes)
Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO 
Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or 
other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting 
thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:
a. Create an Issues Report: requires an affirmative vote of more than 
one-fourth (1/4) vote of each House or majority of one House.
b. Initiate a Policy Development Process ("PDP") Within Scope (as described in 
Annex A<http://www.icann.org/en/about/governance/bylaws#AnnexA>): requires an 
affirmative vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than 
two-thirds (2/3) of one House.
c. Initiate a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an affirmative vote of GNSO 
Supermajority.
d. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Within Scope: requires an affirmative 
vote of more than one-third (1/3) of each House or more than two-thirds (2/3) 
of one House.
e. Approve a PDP Team Charter for a PDP Not Within Scope: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority.
f. Changes to an Approved PDP Team Charter: For any PDP Team Charter approved 
under d. or e. above, the GNSO Council may approve an amendment to the Charter 
through a simple majority vote of each House.
g. Terminate a PDP: Once initiated, and prior to the publication of a Final 
Report, the GNSO Council may terminate a PDP only for significant cause, upon a 
motion that passes with a GNSO Supermajority Vote in favor of termination.
h. Approve a PDP Recommendation Without a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a majority of each House and further requires that one GNSO 
Council member representative of at least 3 of the 4 Stakeholder Groups 
supports the Recommendation.
i. Approve a PDP Recommendation With a GNSO Supermajority: requires an 
affirmative vote of a GNSO Supermajority,
j. Approve a PDP Recommendation Imposing New Obligations on Certain Contracting 
Parties: where an ICANN contract provision specifies that "a two-thirds vote of 
the council" demonstrates the presence of a consensus, the GNSO Supermajority 
vote threshold will have to be met or exceeded.
k. Modification of Approved PDP Recommendation: Prior to Final Approval by the 
ICANN Board, an Approved PDP Recommendation may be modified or amended by the 
GNSO Council with a GNSO Supermajority vote.
l. A "GNSO Supermajority" shall mean: (a) two-thirds (2/3) of the Council 
members of each House, or (b) three-fourths (3/4) of one House and a majority 
of the other House."
Appendix 2: Absentee Voting Procedures (GNSO Operating Procedures 
v2.5)<http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/gnso-operating-procedures-13sep12-en.pdf>
4.4.1 Applicability
Absentee voting is permitted for the following limited number of Council 
motions or measures.
a. Initiate a Policy Development Process (PDP);
b. Approve a PDP recommendation;
c. Recommend amendments to the GNSO Operating Procedures (GOP) or ICANN Bylaws;
d. Fill a Council position open for election.
4.4.2 Absentee ballots, when permitted, must be submitted within the announced 
time limit, which shall be 72 hours from the meeting's adjournment. In 
exceptional circumstances, announced at the time of the vote, the Chair may 
reduce this time to 24 hours or extend the time to 7 calendar days, provided 
such amendment is verbally confirmed by all Vice-Chairs present.
4.4.3 The GNSO Secretariat will administer, record, and tabulate absentee votes 
according to these procedures and will provide reasonable means for 
transmitting and authenticating absentee ballots, which could include voting by 
telephone, e- mail, web-based interface, or other technologies as may become 
available.
4.4.4 Absentee balloting does not affect quorum requirements. (There must be a 
quorum for the meeting in which the vote is initiated.)
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Local time between October and March, Winter in the NORTHERN hemisphere
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reference (Coordinated Universal Time) UTC 11:00
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
California, USA 
(PST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/na/pst.html>) 
UTC-8+0DST 03:00
New York/Washington DC, USA (EST) UTC-5+0DST 06:00
Rio de Janiero, Brazil (BRST) UTC-3+1DST 09:00
Montevideo, Uruguay 
(UYST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/sa/uyst.html>) 
UTC-3+1DST 09:00
Edinburgh, Scotland (BST) UTC+0DST 11:00
London, United Kingdom (BST) UTC+0DST 11:00
Abuja, Nigeria 
(WAT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/africa/wat.html>)
 UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Bonn, Germany (CEST) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Stockholm, Sweden (CET) UTC+1+0DST 12:00
Ramat Hasharon, 
Israel(IST<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/ist-israel.html>)
 UTC+2+0DST 13:00
Karachi, Pakistan 
(PKT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/asia/pkt.html> 
) UTC+5+0DST 16:00
Beijing/Hong Kong, China (HKT ) UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Perth, Australia 
(WST<http://timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/au/wst.html>) 
UTC+8+0DST 19:00
Wellington, New Zealand 
(NZDT<http://www.timeanddate.com/library/abbreviations/timezones/pacific/nzdt.html>
 ) UTC+12+1DST 00:00 - next day
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
The DST starts/ends on last Sunday of March 2013, 2:00 or 3:00 local time (with 
exceptions)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For other places see http://www.timeanddate.com
http://tinyurl.com/alhxou5
Please let me know if you have any questions.
Thank you.
Kind regards,
Glen
Glen de Saint Géry
GNSO Secretariat
gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx<mailto:gnso.secretariat@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
http://gnso.icann.org