<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
[council] IRTP-D Motion
- To: "council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx List" <council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Subject: [council] IRTP-D Motion
- From: Mason Cole <mcole@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 08:48:15 -0800
- List-id: council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-council@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Council colleagues --
I move for the adoption of the attached motion during our next council meeting.
I would appreciate a second to the motion.
Thank you!
Mason
Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Inter-Registrar
Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part D
Whereas
The Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) is an existing consensus policy
under review by the GNSO;
The GNSO Transfers Working Group identified a number of issues in its review of
the current Policy and those issues have been grouped into suggested PDPs, set
A-E, as per the Council's resolution of 8 May 2008;
The GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on IRTP Part D at its meeting on 17
October 2012 (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/resolutions#20121017-4);
A Preliminary Issue Report on IRTP Part D was published on 14 November 2012 for
public comment (see
http://www.icann.org/en/news/public-comment/irtp-d-prelim-issue-report-14nov12-en.htm).;
A Final Issue Report on IRTP Part D was published on 8 January 2012 (see
[include link to Final Issue Report]);
The Final Issue Report recommends that the GNSO Council proceed with a Policy
Development Process limited to consideration of the issues discussed in this
report, and the General Counsel of ICANN has indicated the topic is properly
within the scope of the ICANN policy process and within the scope of the GNSO
RESOLVED:
The GNSO will initiate a PDP on the issues defined in the Final Issue Report on
the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy Part D ([include link to Final Issue
Report]).
A Working Group will be created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements
of the PDP.
<<<
Chronological Index
>>> <<<
Thread Index
>>>
|